Posted on

THE Z-GENERATION AND SOCIAL MEDIA INFLUENCING

The growth of social media has changed corporate communication (public relations), marketing, sales promotion and advertising in many ways. A major part of that has been the rise of “social media influencers” (for more details please read chapter 6.3.5. of my book “Present-Day Corporate Communication”).

A new generation of influencers and “micro-influencers” are proving that one must not be a celebrity to get attention by a broad public for your social media posts and evenmake a business out of it.Some people succeeded in becoming a social media star. They can get a cult-like followings by thousands of fans although they are not celebrities.

A social media influencer can be defined as a person active in the social media who develops messages, which interest and influence a growing online audience and from which they can earn money. In fact, it has become a profession in its own right.

Social media influencers generally make money from endorsing products on their online page. To be successful ambitious social influencers have to develop a distinct “unique selling proposition”, USP (for more details please read chapter 3.2.2.2. of my book “Present-Day Corporate Communication”).

Typical fields in which social influencers play a growing role are fashion, beauty, fitness, wellness, cooking, (mental) health, lifestyle counselling, and life aid guidance.

The recent buzz surrounding social media influencers has led to major media companies taking them very seriously. They and product manufacturers in these and other fields increasingly use social media influencer who have developed a specific audience they are interested in reaching. They are prepared to pay the social media influencer to be mentioned on their social media feeds. This can complement or even replace (print media) advertisements as it is more targeted.

Some social media influencers are able to demonstrate that they can reach specific audiences of more than 30,000 followers. That allows marketers to apply “micro-targeting techniques, which is of high interested to specialized and/or high visibility brands (for more details please read chapter 2.5.2. of my book “Present-Day Corporate Communication”).

How serious this competition for advertising has become is demonstrated by the fact that in the UK, “News UK (https://digiday.com/media/news-uk-launches-influencer-marketing-agency/), which owns “The Times” and “The Sun”, announced that it has created an independent influencer agency.

In addition to some well-known social media influencers, thousands of “micro-influencers” are mushrooming in the online world. They are striving for some importance within very specific niche markets. Sometimes called “Generation Z influencers”, they constitute a new breed in the fast forward moving online world and can demonstrate that they are able to reach ten thousands of followers (for more details please read chapter 2.5.1.2. of my book “Present-Day Corporate Communication”).

To become known as a social media influencer is not easy. In addition, a survey in the UK has proven, that a majority of consumers does not trust social media influencers. Therefore, a social media influencer has to demonstrate integrity to receive the trust of their followers. Simple product endorsements or dull product mentions are not enough to be accepted. Social media influencers’ followers can only be influenced by those whom they choose to follow because they relate to them and trust them as a result of their integrity and independent judgments.

Posted on

TERROR COMMUNICATION

The video filmed by a terrorist at the Christchurch (NZ) was live-streamed online. It seems, that the attack was made for the social media, namely Facebook, YouTube and Twitter. A post on an internet forum featuring right-wing messages linked out to a “manifesto” by the terrorist’s and directed users to a Facebook page that hosted the live stream of the killings. Probably as planned by the terrorists, the video spread like wildfire across social media even after the social media channels took the page down.

It can be concluded that the terrorist attack took the remote location of Christchurch (NZ) as a mere stage for demonstrating the rise of “white supremacy” online. It also confirmed the power of social media in spreading terrorist messages.

The “manifesto” is distinctive in allusions to online meme culture, suggesting an internet-driven evolution of nationalist hatred. The internet is providing people with radical beliefs a space to connect and to socialize with other like-minded people worldwide. The certainty to have other people with similar views makes these views feel more legitimate and widespread than they actually may be.

In recent years, social media has increasingly been used effectively by terrorists. Terrorist violence is political violence. Therefore, terrorists will always try to find publicity to affect the political change they want. The more brutal these postings are, the more the terrorists take control of the narrative away from the media and officials. Some authorities such as the European Commission have exer5cised pressure on social media companies “to take down terrorist propaganda within one hour” and are considering fines for noncompliance.

For more detailed information, please read the chapters on (1) terrorist communication and (2) (communication) management of a terrorist attack in my recently published book “Present-Day Corporate Communication” and www.public-relations-pro.com, covering a number of blogs on topical political issues with a communication angle. Amongst the blogs, you’ll also find my recent Power Point presentation on “Terror Communication” made to the Bangkok Rotary Club.  You can buy your print or e-copy of “Present-Day Corporate Communication on

  • springer.com – https://www.springer.com/gp/book/9789811304019
  • Amazon (Kindle version) – https://www.amazon.com/Present-Day-Corporate-Communication-Practice-Oriented-State-ebook/dp/B07DYKLZPM/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1542940585&sr=8-1&keywords=present-day+corporate+communication
  • Google Play – https://books.google.com.sg/books?id=27BhDwAAQBAJ&pg=PA1&dq=present-day+corporate+communication&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwihysb5veneAhXGeX0KHTkPBwIQ6AEIKTAA#v=onepage&q=present-day%20corporate%20communication&f=false

Copyright Rudolf Beger, 16th of March 2019

Posted on

THE POWER OF DIGITAL COMMUNICATION

THE RAHAF CASE AS AN EXAMPLE

RAHAF Mohammed al-Qunun (18) making her escape from an outdated medieval system dominated by backwards-oriented machos

RAHAF Mohammed al-Qunun (18) made world headlines when she took a flight to escape her Saudi Arabian family who, she said, abused her. From her barricaded airport hotel room she used her phone to beg the world for help claiming fear for her life, and used social media to amplify her calls for asylum. Using Twitter, Rahaf documented the standoff in real time, attracting tens of thousands of followers.

A loose group of activists and friends bolstered her social media campaign using the hashtag #SaveRahaf and was able to stave off deportation. After days of ordeal, the Canadian Prime Minister granted asylum to the Saudi teenager. plans to deport her to deport her.

I want UN!
I want UN!
I want UN!
I want UN!
I want UN!
I want UN!
I want UN!
I want UN!
I want UN!
I want UN!
I want UN!
I want UN!
I want UN!
I want UN!
I want UN!
I want UN!
I want UN!
I want UN!
I want UN!
I want UN!
I want UN!
I want UN!
I want UN!
I want UN!
I want UN!. Rahaf Mohammed January 7, 2019.

One of Rahaf’s communications

Rahaf’s initiative highlighted the power of social media to call attention to her case.

 Some analyst said that Rahaf’s asylum plea was “a genie in the bottle” moment: She cleverly used the power of social media to rise from total anonymity, to make of herself a “star / celebrity”, and motivated an international community to support her.

The social media tool and the use of trending HASHTAGS has changed the way a case or even only one single person can get public attention assumed it grabs the attention of the right organizations or people at the right point in time.

THE POWER OF DIGITAL COMMUNICATION

With the emergence of online media, people today have more access to information than ever before. Literally every day the communications landscape is getting more sophisticated, more complex, and more participatory.

As a result, the public is gaining greater access to information, more opportunities to engage in public speech & comments, and an enhanced ability to undertake collective action.

On the one hand, this provides people with a multitude of new information channels. On the other hand, it enables people or formerly obscure groups, to ignore official communication channels to be heard.

EXAMPLE: US President Trump is a good example. His direct way to communicate with his audiences via Twitter allows him to send his messages unfiltered by the usual layers of official advisors.

The key word in Rahaf’s case was VISIBILITY. Rahaf had just a phone and her determination to fight her case. Her phone gave her a voice, which shortly after she had created a Twitter account and a hashtag, was used to create an unimaginable buzz resulting in an amazing number of 45,000 followers in a day.

A SAUDI OFFICIAL’S REPORTED STATEMENT: A Saudi official is reported to have said that the authorities should not have taken away Rahaf’s passport but her phone. This reported statement perfectly sums up the power of digital communication.

The possibilities offered by the social media gave Rafha a voice that was heard by the whole world and soon caused international attention. As a result, she received thousands of messages and the international support that probably saved her life. Activists all over the world kept tweeting tagging the right authorities and succeeded.

The power of online communication, digital tools and smartphone technology has never been proven so clearly to a worldwide audience. They combined helped Rahaf to amplify her voice in a difficult situation with no personal support available. All she did was to raise her voice on social media, which soon generated a wave of compassion, sympathy, and helpfulness.

It is probably safe to assume that without the social media and her smart use of it, Rahaf would not have gained global attention and she would be deported back to her home country. Instead the world took note and political pressures were mounted to force the governments involved to act in a socially acceptable and humanitarian way.

GOVERNMENTS ARE LEARNING

The Rahaf case sends a strong message to authorities and governments. They must have learnt from this and preceding cases that today it is no longer easy for them to filter, deviate from, or hide stories and to invent or distort stories to better fit their own narrative. In the digital world, people can watch, read and comment, and take initiatives when they feel the need to do it. This is an important game-change.

EXAMPLE: Fact-checking has become a wide-spread new function in the age of “fake news” and “alternative truths”. In a fact-checking process, factual assertions are verified to determine the veracity and correctness of factual statements. Fact checking is supposed to and can encourage politicians to not spread misinformation especially in light of the fact that the corrected “facts” will get widespread attention through the social media and expose the “lying” person as not trustworthy. However,a recent study of Trump supporters found that while fact-checks of false claims made by Trump reduced his supporters’ belief in the false claims in question, the corrections did not alter their attitudes towards Trump.

Digital means of communication and mobile hardware provides the public with the ability to produce rapid and sometimes massive responses (in the millions), which can force politicians, governments and legislators to reverse course.

EXAMPLE: The Philippine’s PM Estrada blamed “the text-messaging generation” for his downfall.”

As first initiated at a wider world wide scale by the #MeToo movement, the feminist movement and its supporters are now raising their voices all over the world against the wrongdoings of politicians or people on whom they are dependent in one way or another in a superordinate and subordinate system.

Even if it is only an isolated case, Rahaf’s successful rescue proves that social media can raise global awareness and change how the world is managed and governed.

Today, everyone has this power in his hands. Information and communication technology and the emergence of social media have changed societies’ and businesses’ way of communicating rapidly. And the pace of change is even accelerating. The development of mobile smart phone technologies has played an important role in this development. Today, mobile devices dominate the total online presence as it puts the possibility to connect anywhere, at any time on any mobile online device in everyone’s hands.

This, as demonstrated through Rahaf’s example, has a real impact on different aspects of society. The power of mobile digital communication and the social media will increasingly shape private life, culture, education, careers, politics, and more.

The effect of social media on politics, in particular, is not only demonstrated by Rahaf’s successful campaign but also by the tremendously increase in influence of social media in political discussions (e.g. Twitter/Trump) and political (election) campaigns, such as the election of Obama as the first African-American president in 2008.

Because social media allow people to communicate with one another with no geographical and other limitations, they are enabling a social organization of and among once-marginalized groups as “communities of interest,” which will increase their influence.

Rahaf’s example also shows that thanks to the Internet and mobile phone technology, and the smart use of it, no one with no or low visibility, even if he finds himself in a precarious situation or has marginal views, will be alone.

When individual voices discover that they have the same interest and views, they can be bundled together using social media platforms and can thus become influential or even powerful. This new power has not yet been fully realized by a lot of people but Rahaf’s brave initiative may help to wake up many sleeping dogs.

Rahaf’s bold and successful move lifted her invisibility to worldwide attention and shifted the balance of power from the hands of a few officials and politicians to a compassionate world audience, a fact from which she benefitted as hoped. For her, the social media used via her mobile phone has become a tool of empowerment and, finally, liberation.

The ability to communicate freely opens the door for those who live in countries where the traditional media is used as a tool of control. The new digital communication tools have the power to radically alter this old world.

Beyond Rahaf’s recent experience, there are other preceding events, which showed the power of digital communication. In all these cases, social media were used by digital activists as a tool to help organizing protests and mobilizing supporters. EXAMPLES:

  • 2001 demonstrations in the Philippines,
  • 2008 Obama election,
  • 2009 revocation of fraudulent elections results in Moldavia,
  • 2011 the M-15 movement in Spain,
  • 2011 the “Arab Spring” in the Middle East,
  • 2011 the “Occupy Wall Street” movement.

These movements greatly exploited social media to establish communication networks and move more effectively towards their objectives.

MIGRATION

Smartphones and social media also play an increasingly important role in migration. Not all but about half of Middle East, Central Asia and African refugees use smartphones and social media to facilitate their movement across borders. For them, mobile phones are central tools during migration journeys and Wi-Fi hotspots have become as necessary as water points. This shows that social media can empower refugees and migrants and, in addition to facilitating their journeys, enables them to make their voices heard.

RAHAF’S CASE HAS BECOME EMBLEMATIC FOR THESE NEW DEVELOPMENTS.

Posted on

THE NEW LONER SUBCULTURE AND ITS EFFECTS ON (CORPORATE) COMMUNICATION

All references in the text refer to the book (“Book”) “Present-Day Corporate Communication” (2018, www.springer.com) by Rudolf Beger (www.public-relations-pro.com).

THE ISSUE

LONELINESS has emerged as a 21st-century invisible epidemic in our dynamic world and is spreading like a virus. Is loneliness on its way to becoming our modern societies’ most lethal condition? If this is so, what kind of consequences will this trend have on Professional (Corporate) Communication?

The British Prime Minister recently announced the appointment of a so-called ”Minister of Loneliness. The UK Government sees “loneliness” as an issue affecting millions of British people, young and old, who claim that they experience day, even many weeks, with no social interaction at all.

But the issue is not just confined to the UK. Loneliness has become a GLOBAL pandemic. Just some examples:  

  • In the USA, 40% of the adult population reported feeling lonely;
  • In JAPAN, the term ‘kodokushi,’ or lonely death, refers to people whose bodies lie undiscovered in their apartments, sometimes for months;
  • A recent survey has revealed that a majority of GERMANS think that loneliness is a big problem in their society but they generally think that social isolation is a personal issue rather than something that should be dealt with by politics;
  • In S.KOREA the term “honjok” is used to describe a new generation that embraces solitude and independence and prefers to live in single-person households.

“Loneliness has gone viral” is a frequently used statement, which provokes the question, why so many people, in totally different societies, are becoming lonelier, and whether this fact has an impact on companies’ and other institutions’ activities when trying to get the attention of these people by means of (corporate) communication. The question is whether corporate communication has to develop a special communication concept for the emerging “loner” generation, and if affirmative, what the special elements of such concept have to be.

MODEL CASE “HONJOK” SUBCULTURE

“Honjok” is a new phenomenon, which describes the loneliness of South Korea’s youth. The word is a neologism combining the words “hon” (alone) and “jok” (tribe). There is even a special website, which is dedicated to a single lifestyle called “honjok.me”. As a reflection of S.Korea’s growing number of single-person households, it stands for a new generation’s specific subculture that embraces solitude and independence.  Almost 28% of the total number of S.Korean households are single-person households, a development which, similar to other countries, is at odds with the Korean society’s traditions.

The “honjok” subculture is characterized by changing attitudes towards romance, marriage and family. Some observers say that “honjok” reflects an attitude of giving up. The current “honjok” generation understands that just working hard does neither guarantee a bright future, nor personal happiness. Thus, the question is asked by these young people, why they should spend most of their time on work and career instead of investing into themselves and their private life. Artists who have discovered the “honjok” generation show them in isolation and as powerless subjects in society.

Local socio-demographic analysis attributes the rise of the “honjok” generation to prevailing social pressures, notably limited time availability depriving the young people of opportunities to interact with each other and a lack of time to dedicate to oneself. As in other countries, current society is considered by younger people as very unstable providing little guidance and behavior mode

ls. That is one of the reasons why new generations of young people increasingly refuse to be compromised by traded life and behavior patterns. The developments are seen as a natural consequence of democracy and economic development.

Not only in S.Korea but also in other Asian societies, individual interests and rights have traditionally been subordinated to those of family or group organizations. But the longer people live in a liberal Western style democracy and the more they are exposed by their digital devices to world wide accessible life patterns and models, the more their traditionally communitarian values become individualistic.

A growing middle class, coupled with government family planning policies, has contributed to a dramatic drop in S.Korea’s fertility rate. In particular women are currently moving away from traditional family and motherhood patterns and opt out from the idea of marriage and raising children. This is in contrast to the past when Koreans came from large families and had five or six siblings. Today, there is a stronger desire for individualism, self-realization and personal happiness, accepting that this new life-style would mean staying single and being alone.

EXAMPLE: S.Korean art photographer, Nina Ahn’s photographs portray the loneliness among young S.Koreans. She said: “In our parents’ generation, people knew that after working hard and saving up for certain number of years, they would be able to buy a house for their family…but we realized that we’ll never be able to own anything like that, even if we work for our entire lives. (My peers) … are responding to life in a wiser way. Our priorities in life have changed.”

In the meantime, the “honjok” generation has become an economic force in its own right. From one-person apartments to restaurants catering, to unaccompanied diners, S.Korean society is increasingly geared toward young singles whose community has become sufficiently important to form a culture with consumer power. It is not surprising to see that once a new “consumer power” group is emerging business will discover them to sell goods and services to them which match the groups expectations.

EXAMPLES: Korean furniture company HANSEM sells foldable tables that double up as a dining table and a drawer for a single-person household. Others sell a mini tripod for smartphones with the description: “Perfect for solo travelers to take selfies.”

IMPACT ON (CORPORATE) COMMUNICATION

ONLINE MEDIA & PLATFORMS

It can be assumed that “loners” are more exposed to digital devices and inclined to use online platforms, and social media in particular, to communicate with the outside world. Therefore, when “loners” belong to a company’s or other organization’s target audience, the appropriate tools should be selected by (corporate) communication practitioners to make the communication effective (for more details please read: Book chapter 3.3. on Online Communication and chapter 2.5.1.2. on communication with Millennials). 

WEBSITE CONTENT

“Loners” will react to more interested in websites with special content, especially those, which will help them developing and confirm them in their special (sub-cultural) lifestyle (for more details please read: Book chapters: 2.6.; 2.9.5.4.;
3.3.1, pp.; 4.1.5.4.; 8.4.7.1.; 8.7.3.1.; 9.5.2.
on Content).

BLOGS & PODCASTS (for more details please read: Book, chapters on blogs: 3.3.4.2.; 4.4.2.6.; 8.7.4.6.;8.10.6.1.; 9.2.5. and podcasts: 3.3.4.1.; 8.4.7.6.).

POTENTIAL IMPACT OF SUBCULTURE ON MAINSTREAM

The “honjok” trend may currently be restricted to a quite limited sub-culture, but, in the past, frequently, subcultural trends have become mainstream and, in the end, acceptable to or even fashionable for a broader societal group.

EXAMPLE: In the 70ies, the Woodstock-Hippie subculture was considered as a temporary movement of some drop-outs. Later it became fashionable to wear hippie-style cloths, hippie haircuts and listen to “flower-power” songs, and today, it is nostalgic and socially totally acceptable to invite for a “hippie” or “flower power” party.

It is neither suggested nor forecast here that the “honjok” subculture might one day become mainstream but it cannot be excluded that this will happen. There is indeed a probability that this may take place, which is nourished by a number of phenomena, which can already be witnessed today:     

INDIVIDUALISTIC VERSUS COMMUNITARIAN

Young people in urban societies follow increasingly a more individualistic instead of a traditional communitarian life style. Their focus is frequently more on work and career than on private life aspects. They are less family-, marriage-, motherhood-, children- oriented than their parents’ generation. They do not live in multi-people or family households but leave early and prefer single-person households, even if it means to accept certain disadvantages. For them, keeping pets is becoming more important to balance out their emotional household. Their prime interest is more on individual happiness and self-fulfillment than on community work and shared interests. This is reflected by a trend towards more solitary interests and hobbies such as reading, art and meditation than on community services, charitable activities and the like.

This trend suggests that conventional methods for defining a company’s or other institutions’ target audiences in preparation of a (corporate) communication plan or campaign (for more details please read: read Book, chapter 2.7., 2.8. and 2.3.2.3.; 3.3.2.2.; 8.8.1.10. and 9.5.2.) may no longer suffice. Instead, more sophisticated micro-targeting methods must be applied to come to better results that promise a better success (for more details please read: read Book, chapter 2.5.2.).

EXAMPLE HOUSING:

As the number of singles grow each year, true for both the older and younger generation, planners have started to think about and address this population’s housing needs. Apartments for single use usually have a size between 16-40 sqm and, in the upper ranks, are generally high-quality, have smart equipment (such as WIFI, sound system, and the like), are fully furnished, multifunctional and minimalist in design. In the lower price brackets, and because of the growing demand, small apartments for single occupants are extremely rare and relatively expensive.

The BERLIN Government found in 2013, that the share of single people in the German capital was surprisingly high at 41% (29% nationwide). The latest available figures (2015) confirm Berlin as the capital of the “lonely” as the number of single-person households clearly now outweighes the number of multiple-person households.

In JAPAN, the development is similar. While Japan historically had a tradition of neighborhood and family ties, people started to place priority on protecting their privacy. Today, the number of single households across Japan has overtaken households with more than one occupant. People in their teens to their 30s account for about 40 percent of single people.

A marketing communication and corresponding (corporate) communication / public relations campaign designed to reach the specific target group with different housing needs must take the needs and behavior patterns of this group into account. This group of tenants / owners may be less interested in gardens, views, balconies, and the like, but in the technical equipment offered, the vicinity of shopping, public transportation and entertainment venues. An important feature can also be to advertise and highlight the character and socio-demographic structure of the neighbourhood in and around the building in question. In addition it should be assumed, that the target group members might have different communication habits and are less reachable by printed matters, advertisements, or small classified ads but online for a and the like.    

EXAMPLE TRAVEL: SOLO TRAVELLING

The fact that today more people remain single for longer, or forever than ever before, has resulted into a rising trend of traveling alone.

EXAMPLES: A UK online behavioural research platform found that there was a 143 per cent increase in “solo travel” searches over the past three years. According to inspiration sharing site Pinterest, recent numbers are even higher – with searches for “solo travel” up by nearly 600 per cent. Hotel booking sites, cruise operators and Airbnb have reported similar increases in lone bookings.

This trend has an impact on hotel bookings, Airbnbs, cruises, other travel related areas, and on marketing communication and (corporate) communications / public relations.

EXAMPLE: In response to the trend, an UK newspaper (Telegraph Travel) has created a new channel for inspiration, news and advice, especially designated for solo travellers: telegraph.co.uk/travel/solo-travel.

Different target audiences require different communication concepts and different communication tools. The Y- (millennials) and the Z-Generation (18-24 year olds) were the most willing to overcome their solo-concerns. In response to this, communication / public relations campaigns and marketing communication has to adapt to their special communication needs and habits (for more details please read Book, chapter 1.3.2.3.; 2.5.1.2.).

 In the past, getting around in the world was hard. The world was a labyrinth and travelling a challenge, in particular as regards language differences and navigation. Under these circumstances it was a better solution to travel together with friends or family for reassurance.

Today, people can much more easily do travel adventures on their own. Internet-based communication services (such as Google) brought to the small screen of a simple smartphone can now steer a traveler to his next location, and words can be translate by special applications from any language back and forth.

The increasing availability of increasingly sophisticated online services and communication tools makes it possible, also for women, to travel alone. In the past, the idea of women going on solo adventures was considered as “risky” or “very brave” but in the meantime there was a marked shift in attitude. This also requires an adaptation of communications concepts in all fields as communicating with women must match their specific expectations and needs.

Solo-travelers are alone either by choice or by circumstance:

  • Some simply do not have a companion to join them on their travels;
  • Others actively chose not to bring along friends or family.

This distinction on target group motivation and behavior also has consequences on communication. For the first category, communication has to offer solutions, provide offers and reassurances; solo travellers, referred to in the second category, do not need another’s reassurance, they make their own independent decisions. For them, communication needs to provide (additional) information, (support) services, motivation and reinforcement.

In the marketing communication and corresponding (corporate) communication / public relations fields, the current trend towards more solo travellers will be influenced by my profound (micro-) targeting in order to ensure that message are well received and effective.   

EXAMPLE: A company offering river cruise programs to solo-travellers has to make sure that solo cabins are offered with no discriminatory single supplements; in case there is sufficient demand, they have to introduce dedicated river cruise itineraries specifically for the solo-traveler sector.

If voyaging alone is supposed to provide a break from monotony and provides exposure to like-minded people and places, which otherwise the traveler would never have seen, the corresponding communication must match this proposition in terms of design, colours, message, tools and means.  

Another aspect is work flexibility. Technology continues to free up the way people work and an increasing number of people finds it attractive and possible to combine a job (by working remotely) with travel.

EXAMPLE: A single PR executive embarked on a solo trip to South East Asia without taking time off. For the single traveler the choice was simple: ”travel alone” or “don’t travel”, a conflict, which was solved by travelling alone but with no change to the work routine by using online tools.

Millennials want variety and a travel experience that feels their own. Their preference for variety is great news for destinations and travel brands because they are interested in experiencing a wide range of vacation types.

This opens two communication opportunities for those who want to sell their destination to this specific target group:

  • To develop and promote a brand image that will make them unique and distinct from competion (for more details on (personal) self-branding please read Book, chapter 8.10.);
  • In addition, this provides a destination or travel brand (once they are established) with an opportunity to communicate in both areas, marketing communication and communication / public relations’ to showcase their uniqueness experiences and adventures and activities they have to offer.

For Millennials in particular, budget is a key factor when it comes to travel but usually they are prepared to spend more money then initially planned when it is considered worthwhile. Communication plans have to take that into account and must not ignore more luxurious offerings.

MORE “LONER“ EFFECTS ON COMMUNICATION

Other effects on (corporate) communication follow from the typical characteristics of the “Loners”:

A typical “LONER”:

  • Books “a table for one” in a restaurant (the French ask in disbelief “tout seul?” when one makes a reservation for one person at a restaurant – meaning: “really? Only for yourself?”);
  • Goes to the museum to decide, which paintings must be seen;
  • Loves his pet(s) more than his fellow people;
  • Spends an above average times on his computer / in the Internet (in the past: TV);
  • Gets involved in extensive and sometimes extreme preferences, such as meditation, religions & beliefs, vegan food, and other elitisms of any kind;
  • Turns his back to any kind of community, charity or political activities;
  • Sees that very movie everyone else thinks is boring;
  • Wakes up early to do exercise, or
  • Likes watching sunrises.

“LONERS BY PREFERENCE” VERSUS “ENFORCED LONELINESS” 

There are many reasons for solitude, intentional or unintentional:

  • INTENTIONAL reasons can be a result of being introverted, religious or otherwise spiritual, personal philosophies or habits (“loners by preference”);
  • UNINTENTIONAL reasons can a result of being highly sensitive, extremely shy, past trauma or nightmarish experiences, mental disorders, or simply advanced age (“enforced loneliness”).

It needs to be noted, that people expressing their very personal desire to be alone, may not be entirely adverse to any human contact. Contrary to many people’s belief, “loners“ frequently do not have a pathological fear of social contact and interaction. When they are approaching or are approached by other people, they usually do not expect immediate results such as friendship, relationship or even intimacy. However, different to others they may see emotional engagement as a risk and decide to follow a more cautious and slower approach when finding out whether the other person is sympathetic and trustworthy.

Caused by US manipulative online platforms such as “Facebook”, societies in the digital age associate themself with a traded (old-fashioned) stereotype that everyone desires to be socialized, have a close-knit or large group of friends and loved ones, etc. This deep-seated desire, in fact, still continues to exist in our contemporary society, but it is increasingly emptied by valueless stereotype US consumer promotion and mass communication formulas and transformed into a meaningless empty word or perverted into caricatures of their true value and meaning.

EXAMPLE: The despicable misuse of the word “friend” by Facebook, which already calls someone “a friend” who is just a miserable voyeur. Those who know that a friend in life is something very rare and very valuable would refuse to use the word “friend” for their friends. A new word for real friendship needs to be invented in order to distinguish itself from this low life perverted US standard mush.

From this it can be concluded that someone who does not match the US cliché of socialized behavior and who prefers solitude, should not, as frequently done, attributed as strange, depressed, feeling unloved, or insecure. This is not true. “Loners” are very diverse individuals. The only characteristic they possess that separates them from alternative social behaviors and categorizations is that they prefer their loneliness.

EXAMPLE: A person is reluctant to entering closer social interactions with colleagues on the job, beyond what is necessary for doing a good job. In contrast, the same person may be extremely social and highly charismatic during parties or other private social gatherings with people outside work.

“LONER-BY-PREFERENCE“

“Loners by preference” are generally people who would rather be alone then with others. They consciously decided to stay alone and avoid or do not actively seek human interaction as in their view being on their own and loneliness can be a positive experience. Being alone gives them time to be themselves, without having to worry about being judged by others.

“Loners” are perceived as some of the more intellectual people whose intelligence makes them capable of being content in solitude. Different to socially fully integrated people, loners are generally not chronically impatient, which is one of the characteristics of the digital age. It is common among loners to have more solitary interests and hobbies, such as reading, arts, wellness and fitness, and meditation. They typically attend movies, concerts, art gallery openings, receptions and other public and social events alone, by doing this exhibiting their strength and inward focus on enjoying life without needing others.

“ENFORCED LONER”

 

The “enforced loners” are those people who are “pathologically shy” (as a child), whose shyness and anxiety inhibits them from socializing (in some cases for all their life), pathological introverts, people suffering from traumata and other major life problems groups, and in particular old people who, for whatever reason, have lost all their surrounding social community’s reach and support.

EXAMPLE: A mother told her son at the age of 97 that she felt very lonely although her brain was fit and she was open-minded to any developments surrounding her. “All my friends died or got dementia, I have nobody to talk to”, she complained before she decided to die.

YOUNG “LONERS”

It is a stereotype that only elderly persons are lonely whilst young people enjoy rich social activities in their respective communities. This is no longer the case.

Some experts are even suggesting that young people feel loneliness more intensely because they are at a life stage of discovering who they are. Between 16 and 24 years of age, young people generally go through a time of identity change and personal development, experience gathering, as a result of which, they are learning to regulate emotions, building up self-confidence and correcting dreams. In some cases this can lead to a feeling of isolation. 

There are some main reasons related to modern life, why so many Millennials and younger people say they feel lonely:

GENERAL FACTORS ASSOCIATED WITH BEING YOUNG

One might think of the ages of 16-24 as a time for young people of new freedom to have fun, leaving school, having more control over life, trying to work out who they are and where they fit into the world. In addition, it is also a time of transition (moving away from home, starting university, starting the first job, experiencing the first “real” love), all factors, which have the potential of disrupting well-established relationships and changing environments the young people got to used to.

DIGITALISATION AND INTERNET

In the digital age, often little time is left for meaningful, face-to-face communication with others.

  • In the past, before urban migration became standard and travel became affordable, ordinary people did not venture too much beyond where they had been born. Their daily surroundings were the community and social institutions. It was here where they gathered and felt comfortable: The parish church, community centers, local companies (employers), groups upholding traditions, political parties, charities, sports clubs, and the like;
  • For an individual in today’s mega-cities, finding a place can feel daunting. The permanent challenges of urban life and the continuous offer of home-entertainment available at low cost to everybody at any time often leave people depleted of their personal initiative, motivation, energy and time needed to engage. As a consequence, individuals living in big cities may typically cope by guarding their space, closing up (even to their neighbours), protect their privacy and time. As a result, their behavior may become less open and sociable.


EXAMPLE: When one gets on a public mass transport system, the first thing one sees what people do is pulling out their smartphone, plugging headphones in and scrolling the screen without looking up or at anyone. Some individuals even manage to walk with their smartphones right in front of their face like sleepwalkers expecting that others take care of avoiding physical collisions.

It becomes obvious just from observing the masses in big cities that digital connections based on the Internet are increasingly replacing face-to-face human interaction (for more details, please read Book, chapter: 1.4.2.1.). The smartphone screens have created a barrier to connection and face-to-face oral and visual communication that is starting to carry a profound human social cost.

Face-to-face interactions, accidental small talk, eye contact and a smile have become mundane and, increasingly frequently, unusual activities. Fleeting moments of friendly contact, which remind people that they are not alone, connected, and belong to something bigger are getting rare.

It is said “comparison is the thief of joy”. Indeed, the digital technology and smartphones have proliferated and perfected the means through which everybody can compare himself to others.

EXAMPLE: One only needs to take the smartphone from the pocket for a quick look at all the better-looking, more affluent and more successful people around us. This has the risk that feelings of inadequacy are amplified with the frequent result of insecurity, (acquired) shyness, a downward spiral into self-doubt and inward retreats, all of which can lead to social alienation. A person sensitive to this bombardment of pictures and messages may develop beliefs that his life is ‘less than’ and that the lives of others are positive, good, happy, sociable etc. These negative self-perceptions can become a vicious cycle of negative emotional patterns, which in turn can lead to feelings of loneliness.

Although the Internet and social media platforms like Facebook are generally believed to be used for alleviating the individual user’s loneliness, the Internet makes an individual’s viral. In fact, the Internet provides a platform for social interaction but it can also isolate people and hinder remaining face-to-face relationships.

EXAMPLE: The “lonely” use of gaming, gambling, porn and sex platforms.

Another reason why the Internet makes people lonely is the risk that real relationships are substituted with online relationships. Temporarily one might feel better when engaging others virtually. But it is quickly realized that these connections and communications tend to be superficial and ultimately become frustrating. This makes clear, and has been confirmed by a number of studies, that online social contacts are not an effective alternative for offline social interactions.

On the contrary, online technology can even hinder genuine offline connection and communication. Excessive Internet use can also increase the feeling of loneliness because it disconnects the users from the real world.  Research has demonstrated that lonely people use the Internet to “feel totally absorbed online”, a state of mind that inevitably subtracts time and energy that could otherwise be spent on social activities and building emotionally more fulfilling offline relationships and even friendships.

It becomes obvious just from observing the masses in big cities that digital connections based on the Internet are increasingly replacing face-to-face human interaction. The smartphone screens have created a barrier to connection and face-to-face oral and visual communication that is starting to carry a profound human social cost.

EXAMPLE: When one gets on a public mass transport system, the first thing one sees what people do is pulling out their smartphone, plugging headphones in and scrolling the screen without looking up or at anyone. Some individuals even manage to walk with their smartphones right in front of their face like sleepwalkers expecting that others take care of avoiding physical collisions.

Face-to-face interactions, accidental small talk, eye contact and a smile have become mundane and, increasingly frequently, unusual activities. Fleeting moments of friendly contact, which remind people that they are not alone, connected, and belong to something bigger are getting rare.

Effective communication to “Loners” must be capable of breaching into their space to open up closed up and unsocial environments without being perceived as “invading”. Again, a very detailed and profound micro-targeting activity has to be initiated with the goal of identifying the character of the group in question and adapting conventional communication means to the group’s needs and (sub-) culture.

Rudolf Beger, January 2019

Posted on

COMMUNICATION IN THE ART WORLD

“BE SMART ABOUT ART”

THE ART OF PROFESSIONAL COMMUNICATION IN THE ART WORLD

BY RUDOLF BEGER

Many references will be made in this paper to the author’s standard-setting guide book: “Present-Day Corporate Communication“, in particular to Chapter 8.8. “ART SECTOR COMMUNICATION” (www.public-relations-pro.com). The literature of these chapters will allow the reader to dig deeper into the subject issue discussed or will put the texts into a broader perspective. References will be made to the Guidebook and its relevant chapters / sub-chapter numbers (example: read Guidebook: followed by (sub-) chapter-No.).

1. THE ART INDUSTRY IS DIFFERENT

The culture & art sector is an industry in the sense that it groups people and institutions, which are active in one specific type of business.

However, different to other more conventional industries the art industry involves activities characterised by

  • Creativity,
  • Imagination,
  • A mix of tangible and intangible goods and, in addition,
  • An important influence of subjectivity with corresponding individual or collective judgements.

UNESCO DEFINITION: The UNESCO has defined culture (and art) as “a set of distinctive spiritual, material, intellectual, and emotional features of society or a social group, and that it encompasses, in addition to art and literature, lifestyles, ways of living together, value systems, traditions and beliefs”.

Culture is a social heritage. It plays a significant role in the development of society. The way to bridge between the arts and art consumers, to share culture and art is through COMMUNICATION (read Guidebook: 8.8.1.1.).

In this paper, some of the governing principles of communications in the cultural / arts sector are discussed and some more detailed advice is provided.

2. MAJOR ART SECTOR PLAYERS

Major players in the arts sector include, amongst others:

2.1. ON THE ARTISTIC SIDE

THE ARTIST

Artists are talented people who are engaged in the activity of creating and representing artwork in a multitude of areas, including paintings, drawings, sculptures, pottery, photography, video, film, performances, dance, installations, mixed media and any other medium.

2.2. ON THE COMMERCIAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE SIDE

2.2.1. THE GALLERY

Someone who runs an art gallery identifies artists of interest, chooses artists and artwork and presents it in the gallery for sale. Galleries may specialise in specific areas. A gallery owner or manager’s responsibilities include managing both the creative and business sides of running an art gallery, as well as organizing and preparing / curating exhibitions, private sales and loaning out art. A gallery manager’s skills should include an eye for art, creative flair, an awareness of trends, business, financial, marketing, sales, negotiation and communication.

2.2.2. THE CURATOR

A curator is in charge of a collection of exhibits in a museum or art gallery, and is responsible for assembling, cataloguing, managing, presenting and displaying artworks, cultural collections and artefacts. The skills required to become a curator are, amongst others: Research capabilities, art/cultural history knowledge and awareness, organizational, project management, communication skills and the capability for presenting art / artist to an interested public with a creative flair.

2.2.3. THE ART AGENT

An art agent represents an artist working on their behalf to promote and sell their work. The role involves negotiating individual sales, commissions, licensing deals, as well as organizing publicity, and seeking opportunities such as teaching and workshops. An art agent needs negotiation skills and financial acumen, knowledge in communication / PR, networking and marketing, and an alert awareness of art trends.

2.2.4. THE ART CONSULTANT / ADVISOR

Art consultants, also known as art advisors, act as an intermediary between artists, galleries and auction houses, and buyers by helping art collectors select and acquire art for their home, business, or collection as well as help them sell pieces they no longer require. The skills required include a great eye for art, negotiation and communication skills, the “art of listening”, and knowledge in sales practices, finances and taxes.

2.2.5. THE ART DEALER

An art dealer is a person or company that buys and sells works of art commercially with aim of making a profit. Skills required include a great eye for art, awareness of trends, negotiation, communication and networking skills, and sales, finance and tax knowledge.

2.2.6. THE ART AUCTIONEER

An art auctioneer works on behalf of their clients to sell pieces of art for the highest possible price. The art auctioneer is responsible for setting the (estimation) price of the artwork. Art auctioneers need to be active in the arts by attending art exhibitions at galleries and museums, as well as attending art lectures and other related professional events to keep a high level of knowledge and insight into a dynamic market. To be an art auctioneer one has to have knowledge in art history relevant to their area of expertise, expertise in art research, art valuation and art marketing as well as in business and interpersonal skills.

2.3. ON THE SCIENTIFIC SIDE

2.3.1. THE ART VALUER

Similar to an art auctioneer an art valuer gives advice on how much a work of art or a collection of art is worth. Like art auctioneers, art valuers need to be active in the art world, for example, by attending art exhibitions at galleries and museums, as well as attending art lectures and other related professional events. To be an art valuer, experience in art research, art history, the (international) art markets communication and financial affairs are needed.

2.3.2. THE ART CONSERVATOR

Art conservators are responsible for restoring, preserving and analysing artefacts and works of art. Art conservators tend to specialise in particular types of objects or materials such as books, paintings, sculptures or textiles. An art conservator must have experience in art research, art and cultural history and, of course, extensive technical skills and a deep knowledge in materials and relevant products.

2.3.3. THE ART HISTORIAN

Art historians study art created in the past, learning about artists’ lives and their societies, understanding the context in which art was created and seeking to interpret and understand these works of art for the preservation of future generations. Art historians must have a deep knowledge and experience in academic research, art and cultural history, fine arts, analytical skills and a writing talent.

2.4. ON THE ART CUSTOMER SIDE

2.4.1. THE ART CRITIC

An art critic specializes in interpreting, analyzing and evaluating art. Art critics produce written critiques or reviews that are published in newspapers, magazines, books, exhibition brochures and catalogues and well as online (e.g. websites and blogs). Art critics can become highly influential and can make or break artists’ careers simply by using their words. Skills required for art critics include market knowledge, writing, editing and analytical talents.  

2.4.2. THE ART COLLECTOR

Art collectors are art lovers who connect with, are devoted to the arts or artist(s) and who develop a certain expertise in the field of art they are specifically interested in and who establish a collection either based on a concept, or based on emotions. Most art collectors are people who love and value the pieces that they purchase. They want to live with art and appreciate it on a regular basis.

2.4.3. THE ART LOVER

Art lovers are those people who feel attracted by and have an interest in the arts without necessary being collectors / art buyers.

2.4.4. THE ART TOURIST

Similar to art lovers but many art tourists are not really interested in the arts but feel attracted by the social events surrounding the presentation of artwork. They see, for example, gallery openings more as a social event at which they can meet people and get free drinks and snacks than an opportunity to be introduced to artistic work.  

3. EFFECTIVE ART COMMUNICATION

It cannot always be assumed that “art speaks for itself”. Therefore, even successful artists should be keen on articulating their creative vision professionally. Frequently, creative people can be weak in communication as many of them are introverts, some of them egocentric or even arrogant. They risk being misunderstood, rejected or are missing opportunities when they ignore the fact that generally they are the most credible advocate for their own work.

Successful communication by an artist or his representative (normally an art gallery) is to speak effectively and in a comprehensible language about artwork.

3.1. PRINCIPLES

3.1.1. KEY ELEMENTS OF COMMUNICATION IN THE ARTS FIELD

3.1.1.1. STORY, RELEVANCE AND VALUES

The above-referenced additional complexity of communication in the arts market is best dealt with when developing a communication concept the following three elements are considered:

  • Art gallery managers must generate relevant “stories” (reference);
  • “Communities” should be developed around art events (reference), and
  • “Dialogue” with relevant audiences must be generated with the objective of creating curiosity, interest, understanding and, if possible, a certain hype in the relevant arts audiences (read Guidebook:).

In addition developing a “story”, a communication practitioner in the arts field should deal with two additional elements of a sound communication concept: “Relevance” and “values”.

3.1.1.1.1. THE STORY

For many people, the concept “art for art” (“l’art pour l’art”) is not enough. The art audiences expect a contribution by the artwork / either to the community or to the prevailing cultural life in general or specifically. Key elements of such a contribution are a story, which is relevant for the targeted audiences and which is carrying values. 

While a great piece of art will attract a buyer, a great story will sell it. There are many artists who feel they should let the art speak for itself. This ignores an important human interest in narrative. While each buyer is going to bring their own interpretation to a work of art, they are also interested in the artists or an art expert’s inspiration. Some art lovers particularly want to understand the process for creating the artwork. What the artist or the art expert tell them about the art piece will become a part of the narrative people share with friends, family and business associates who see the art in their home or office.

The story and its angle (frequently called the “hook”, read Guidebook: 1.3.5.2.; 8.4.7.9.) must be developed in consideration of all multipliers’ (read Guidebook: 2.5.1.1.) and social media influencers’ (rad Guidebook: 2.5.1.1.; 6.3.4.1.; 6.3.5.; 8.7.4.4.) needs. It needs to be asked, for instance, what specialised art journalists want and are interested in and which story will trigger their attention in the growing information overload (read Guidebook: 1.3.5.; 6.3.3.2.). The answers to the questions will influence the content of the pitch (read Guidebook: 3.2.2.2.; 3.3.2.6.).

Digitalization and the universal access to the Internet (read Guidebook: 3.3.), has substantially changed professional communications. The development has gone away from traditional “one-way communication” towards “two-way communication” (read Guidebook: 1.3.3.; 3.1.2.; 3.3.1.1.; 3.3.2.1.; 3.3.3.2.; 7.16.2.4.). This is in particular the case in the art world, in which the creative development of “stories” and narratives in which the “human factor” (the artist) is central.

Finally, it is important to use online channels to tell a compelling story in relation to the artwork, artist and gallery in the same way one would do offline. The cost of getting into the online game is so much lower than ever before and the know-how of layman users has grown in a way that the barriers to entry for galleries have more or less disappeared.

3.1.1.1.2. THE RELEVANCE

Once the artist has a particular, unique and interesting story to tell and the story is professionally developed, it can help to attract the specialised media and relevant audiences’ attention. The condition is, however, that the story is relevant for the target audience. It can frequently be observed that art projects and works are solely explained from the point of view of the artist and / or his representatives. This is fine as long as the story connects with the audience. The risk is that it does not in case no balance is found between the importance of the cultural experience, in general, the artwork, in particular, the artist and his gallery, on the one hand, and the interest and expectations of the audiences (art lovers, collectors, art critics, etc.), on the other hand. 

3.1.1.1.3. THE VALUES

When one talks about value in this context, it is not only the monetary value, which is referred to but also the spiritual value and the value of an artwork in the context of an art movement or as part of an artist’s lifelong work. Value in this sense is a key element of an artwork’s or cultural project’s identity and appreciation. It is its inherent value what will make an artwork or an art project stand out and gain special appreciation. 

EXAMPLE: A highly talented German artist who lived in Munich in the nineteen hundred thirties and forties was banned from working under the National Socialist regime because his art was defamed as “degenerated art”. A large part of his secretly painted paintings burned in his studio during the allied bombing raids on the city during WWII. After the war the artist could only paint a few pictures before his death. Today these remaining paintings are scattered all over the world in private collections and are hardly or not at all known to the broad public interested in art. Only the work of an art historian saved the painter from oblivion. Against the background of his destroyed work, the small remainder of rescued paintings has gained a special (inner) value, which may not necessarily be reflected in the selling price but in the appreciation of a knowledgeable collector or art historian.

One of the additional attractions of artwork is that beyond the emotional attachment to a piece of art, the object is generally more likely to keep its value compared to most consumer products. In some cases, the value can even grow, which is some collectors’ dream or speculation when they see art merely as a good investment. For other art collectors it is a combination of all, beauty, investment and lucky chance.

3.1.1.2. JARGON (read Guidebook: 3.2.4.1.; 3.2.4.2., 7.10.8.; 8.8.1.2.)

Often art experts use a screwed, high-sounding or artificially intellectualized language. This happens under the premise that art is destined for an intellectual minority in which it is communicated in a language that is incomprehensible to outsiders. Proper communication should avoid the typical “art speak”, which frequently comes with the art world. Art should be accessible and enjoyable to everyone rather than confusing people with strange words and exotic phrases or languages. Under the following website address one can find a guide which aims at helping art lovers, collectors and laymen to understand some terms which they may be unfamiliar with (https://affordableartfair.com/inspiration/glossary-of-art-terms/).

However, this will not help with narratives used by some gallery managers, artists and art experts, some of which need to be read three times or remain totally incomprehensible. This is neither helpful nor understandable as clear thoughts and concepts can easily be expressed in relatively simple language. If a text becomes a mystery, it is a signal that the author is either pretentious or vane or in love with his own words rather than interested in bringing his message across. 

EXAMPLE 1: “There is a gap in the existing research on narrative by describing narrative as a form of intersubjective process of sense-making between two agents, a teller and a reader. It argues that making sense of narrative literature is an interactional process of co-constructing a story-world with a narrator. Such an understanding of narrative makes a decisive break with both text-centred approaches that have dominated both structuralist and early cognitivist study of narrative, as well as pragmatic communicative ones that view narrative as a form of linguistic implicature. The interactive experience that narrative affords and necessitates at the same time serves to highlight the active yet cooperative and communal nature of human sociality, expressed in the many forms than human beings interact in, including literary ones”.

EXAMPLE 2:….seeking a new artistic language that would combine the spiritual and the physical, the solid and the fluid, the ephemeral and the permanent, a melding of the rational and the instinctual, or of the human and the animal minds out of a primordial state of organic chaos.

3.1.1.3. CONTENT (read Guidebook: 2.6.; 2.9.5.4.;3.3.1.5.; 3.3.1.;3.3.3.; 3.3.4.2; 4.1.5.4.; 8.4.7.1.; 8.7.3.1.; 9.5.2.)

In communications, one has to establish, develop and spread dialogue (reference). In the field of culture and art, dialogue starts with “content”. We should be able to explain the content as much as possible and deliver it to different audiences

Quality content is also important and new hashtags have to be created. This will only be possible, when there is a clear focus on quality content that people are prepared to share.

A hashtag (read Guidebook: 3.3.2.5.; 8.4.7.8.; 8.4.7.9.) that is linked to informative posts will make the chances for getting trendy much higher.

3.1.1.4. MASS CONSUMPTION

A new development, which has to be taken into account when planning communication in the art field is, that in the world of art, cultural consumption has developed much more towards mass consumption than in the past.

Today, more music is heard and more videos are watched in an increasingly effective and diverse way. New technologies and tools allow easy access, new platforms, new formats, direct interrelations between artists and their audiences, and combine face to face contact with online contact and individual experiences with group experiences.

3.1.1.5. KEY AUDIENCES AND COMMUNITY BUILDING

In times of increasingly quick constant change, one needs to know who the key audiences are, what they do, and what trends influence their thinking in order to communicate with them effectively (read Guidebook: 2.5.; 2.5.1.; 3.2.4.1.; 3.3.2.6.; 3.3.4.2.; 8.2.3.4.; 8.4.5; 8.4.7.9.; 8.8.1.4.; 8.10.5.5.; 9.3.4.). There are a number of questions, which help understanding key audiences:

  • Who are the key audiences, based on socio-demographic data?
  • Why are they interested in the arts?
  • Are they art collectors or art professionals or just art lovers? What are their motivations to be interested in the arts and what interests and expectations do they hope to get fulfilled?

Based on the responses to these questions the audiences should be segmented (for instance into art professionals and art lovers). An effective segmentation could for instance also be the frequency of interaction with the gallery: How often does the group consume arts and culture? This can help distinguishing between new, sporadic, recurrent and frequent audiences, which will provide additional information about how to relate to this specific group:

  • What art style, related gallery services and gallery activities might interest them the most?
  • What kinds of gallery offers and promotions might draw their attention?
  • How often?
  • What priority media and channels do they use to communicate?

One way of communicating with audiences effectively is to build communities around a cultural project or event. Non-audiences are undoubtedly the largest group. A non-audience groups people who do not know the art, the artist and the event, or who are not interested in what is offered. Audience recruitment strategies can be used to turn non-audiences into potential audiences.

3.1.2. ART GALLERY COMMUNICATION (read Guidebook: 8.8.)

3.1.2.1. ROLE OF AN ART GALLERY 

Because of the specific features of the art world, the role of art galleries can best be described as an intermediary or “bridge builder” between art and artists and their audiences.

Whether an artist is well established or taking his first steps to introduce his work to an interested public, a good art gallery puts his work in front of art lovers, collectors, buyers, art critics and the art media.

The art gallery uses professional means to generate new interest and sales, educates buyers about the artwork and creates new opportunities for the artist. In addition, an art gallery will allow its artists to spend their time creating rather than getting involved in handling negotiations, payment procedures, administrative work, logistics and shipping.

In this paper, it is discussed how to make this communication with art audiences more efficient and to connect better with art audiences’ expectations.

Art galleries have to understand that, in the field of arts, in addition to providing points of connection, emotions are at play and need to be taken into account. This can make professional communication in the art world more complex than communication in other fields.

Collecting art is not just a hobby for wealthy people. This widespread perception is a result of frequent media reporting on important international auctions or famous private collections. There is a wide field of affordable art, which is not just restricted to prints, re-prints, other forms of multiples, formulaic and cheap work.

Art galleries have to see each visitor as an individual who needs to be understood. This requires work to get to know the buyer, which is best done by entering into a dialogue with the goal to enter into a long-term relationship. The relationship will be off on the right foot if the visitor understands that he is a person of interest and that the immediate goal of the dialogue is not in making a sale.

This is corresponding with many artists’ perspective that the process of creating and presenting their art to an audience is not necessarily always about making a sale. It needs to be considered that the evaluation of the final art work as the end product of an artistic, creative process is not in all cases been meant to become subject to evaluation by (expert) third parties. There are artists who reject this process and do not care about market approval.     

3.1.2.2. ART GALLERY BUSINES MODEL TYPES

3.1.2.2.1. BY TYPE

3.1.2.2.1.1. “EXPERT NETWORK” ART GALLERIES

Art galleries in the expert network are generally non-profit (non-commercial) galleries integrated into a network of art institutions such as schools of fine art, museums, artists’ collectives, associations, and local art institutions. In these networks the characteristics of collaboration are joint exhibitions, annual activity reports, the co-publication of catalogues and the provision of accommodation for artists-in-residence. The networks provide artists with a studio, financial support, relevant contacts and access to exhibition opportunities.

3.1.2.2.1.2. “DEALER NETWORK” ART GALLERIES

The dealer network is made up of (commercial) galleries, which identify, select and exhibit (mainly local) artists based on subject matter, quality, emotional and decorative criteria. Normally there is little cooperation between galleries and between galleries and other art institutions in this type of network. 

3.1.2.2.2. BY GALLERY TYPE

3.1.2.2.2.1. “POINT-OF-SALE” ART GALLERIES

A point-of-sale gallery acts as a typical intermediary between artists and buyers / art collectors. The majority of commercial art galleries follow this model. Generally, they do not develop networks (in which they are the central point) but use the artist as the centre of their activities. Their primary role is to plan, organise and host exhibitions and possible accompanying programs, notably the opening (“vernissage”) and the “finissage” at the end of the show. Usually, point-of-sale galleries do not participate in art shows, salons and do not produce catalogues.

3.1.2.2.2.2. “PROMOTION” ART GALLERIES

Promotional art galleries are normally headed by trained art professionals and primarily support researched, innovative art. These galleries are typically part of larger networks of cultural institutions (for instance museums or art foundations). They often share the printing of art catalogues, the cost / organisational work of joint exhibitions, art fair participations and acquisitions of artwork.

3.1.2.2.2.3. “SPRINGBOARD” GALLERIES

Frequently, “springboard” galleries are non-profit organisations, which are financed by subsidies and firmly integrated into institutional networks. Their primary task is to provide an artist with a first step opportunity for getting noticed, making career and by increasing his work’s market value. Collaborations with exhibitors, participation in catalogue production and cost of artwork production are typical activities.

3.1.2.2.2.4. INSTITUTIONS OUTSIDE THE ART GALLERY SYSTEM

The promotion of artwork can also be done by non-art institutions who use the arts as a communication / PR means to promote their business, attract customers beyond conventional marketing and foster their (corporate) image / reputation. Hotels, restaurants, association offices and corporate headquarters are typical venues for these kind of art presentations. Typically, the art shown at these locations is traditional, figurative and mostly decorative in nature.

3.1.2.2.3. BY ARTIST TYPE

3.1.2.2.3.1. “SALON” ARTIST

The typical salon artist produces traditional art, executed with traditional materials and using traditional techniques. The artists in this sector achieve commercial success through sales and as many as possible exhibitions at galleries and art fairs. The art gallery’s role is very much limited to the commercial, informative and technical aspects, and less to artistic and intellectual aspects. Therefore, the discourse between the parties is mostly technical and not analytical or critical. The typical customer / collector is mainly interested in the genre of the artwork, the art school / movement it belongs to and the positioning in that movement of the artist in question.   

3.1.2.2.3.2. “ARTISAN-ENTREPRENEUR” ARTIST

Art photographers are a typical example for this group of artists. Their character is similar to the salon-artists’ but they are more entrepreneurial as they may surround themselves with a team of assistants and technicians. Their market is developed through websites, interior decorators, architects and communication / public relations agencies.  

3.1.2.2.3.3. “360°” ARTIST

The 360° artist can be compared to the artisan-entrepreneur artist, but his creativity does not necessarily manifest itself in the production of pure artwork but can encompass other forms of art such as performances, installations, audio-visual presentations or other mixed-media performances and products derived from the initial work which can then be merchandised. The success of a 360° artist depends on the effectiveness of his network which is surrounding him in the centre.

EXPLANATION: In a 360° deal, an art gallery typically provides support to an artist in more areas than covered by a traditional contract on the condition of receiving a percentage of revenue from these additional areas. The 360° deal reflects the fact that part of an artist’s income now comes from sources other than his art music, such as merchandising reproductions, p.p..

3.1.2.2.3.4. “ART-FAIR” ARTIST

Art-fair artist essentially produce art work which is appealing to institutions and collectors. Their recognition in the art market depends on the frequency and visibility of their presentations at local, national and international art fairs and art salons and the effectiveness of a professional curator.

3.1.2.2. MARKET ANALYSIS

3.1.2.2.1. ART COLLECTOR ANALYSIS

Knowing what motivates collectors can give an art gallery an edge when selling art. The gallery should know that not all collectors are the same. Whether it is the collector’s emotional attachment, a rational collecting concept or social aspects, the gallery’s approach with each collector should be just as different as the reasons they collect art.

Therefore, an art gallery who comes across a true art collector should find out exactly about the motivation of the collector:
 

  • If the art collector cares about social status, the art gallery should outline its showing history and mention past clients to impress this type of art collector;
  • If the art collector connects emotionally with an artwork then the gallery should show more pieces of the same genre;
  • If the art collector admires the story behind art then the gallery should have the details ready. The art collector appreciates to learn about the artist and the artwork, for instance why and how it was created.

Some art collectors want to connect with the artist. The gallery should understand that for these collectors, an artist’s story or an artwork’s story can be as important as the artwork itself. After getting to know the gallery’s expertise and after learning, for instance, how the artist became an artist, how and when he developed his particular style, or what his source of inspiration was such a collector may seriously fall in love with the artwork in question.

Other collectors simply enjoy the dynamics of the art community, which includes meeting up with like-minded friends and enjoying being seen at art events, such as gallery openings. In these cases the gallery has to go where these collectors go, for instance art fairs, other gallery openings and museum receptions to represent the gallery’s program

3.1.2.2.2. STUDIES AND SURVEYS

If an art gallery has funds available and wants to learn more about its relevant markets and target customers, it can commission a number of research work to better understand the environment it is operating in. Studies and surveys can include in particular:

  • A customer satisfaction survey,
  • A socio-economic impact study, to identify and evaluate the potential socio-economic and cultural impact on customers and the community of a proposed showing of a selected artist, including
  • A study on the gallery’s target audiences (a socio-economic study), and
  • A survey on who the art gallery visitors / customers are (an empirical study),
  • A communication audit, which will help to understand the effectiveness of print and online communications,
  • An awareness survey,
  • A pricing policy audit (to be in line with the most recent price trends in the relevant art segment as regards the artist in question),
  • A partnership research study.

Free tools like Google Analytics can be helpful in this endeavour.

3.1.2.3. STRATEGIC AND BRAND POSITIONING

Right at the beginning of its activities, an art gallery has to make a basic strategic decision: What will be the concept and, following from this, the program of the gallery?

The most important choices to make are what kind of program the art gallery wants to represent. For instance they have to make a choice between different types of and types of art practised by the artists, such as,

  • Established and emerging artists,
  • The artist’s relationship with innovation:
    • Conceptional innovation (precisely planned artworks),
    • Experimental innovation (undefined objectives, more trial & error),
  • Conservative (classic) art and contemporary art,
  • Avantgarde art and experimental art.

3.1.2.3.1. STRATEGIC POSITIONING (read Guidebook: 1.2.; 2.1.2.)

It is erroneous to assume that any gallery is right for an artist, no matter what kind of art that artist makes. Normally art galleries have developed a concept for their gallery program and the artists they want to show. Gallery owners can become quite particular about the types of art and artists they want to represent, and, in the overwhelming majority of cases, only show particular defined genres, types and styles of art.

3.1.2.3.2. STRATEGIC GALLERY COOPERATIONS

A lot of art galleries have understood that, if the gallery concepts are either corresponding with or complementing each other, working together can be better than competition. Nowadays there are a lot of initiatives, under which art galleries are promoting each other’s weekend, late night or local art festival openings and encourage cross-pollination of art lover audiences. The construction of a cultural partnership can also be of interest if it is coherent with the respective gallery’s communication objectives.

3.1.2.3.3. BRANDING (read Guidebook on Self-Branding: 8.10.)

In the past, the term “branding” was deemed a dirty word in art, museum and art gallery circles. Increasing competition in the art market and the emergence of social media and the corresponding information overload (reference) has led to a change in thinking. Today, one can notice that art galleries, museums and art exhibitions are increasingly embracing branding and are accepting that having a clear vision and identity can be beneficial. A sound (visual) brand identity can be used as a tool for reviving institutions such as museums and established art galleries and art exhibitions to make them more appealing to a rapidly changing modern audience. Main reasons for branding or rebranding include new development and repositioning of brand image, changes in architectural arrangement, commemoration of an occasion or the wish to increase gallery revenue through increased visitor numbers, sponsors and donors.

However, the increasing trend towards more identity building in an increasingly competitive art world has created a dilemma. With commercial art galleries realizing the growing importance of branding, the most important challenge for them is to find a balance between their primary role of representing the artists and their work, and the promotion of the art gallery / art exhibition’s own brand. The risk is that art galleries push their own identity or the identity of the art event so much that it overpowers the identity of the promoted artists.

In the art world (this includes museums, art galleries, art events and exhibitions) brand identity is created by design work, which encompasses logo and stationery projects, and extends to broader intelligible brand identity programs that include interior graphics and way-finding, catalogues, flyers and posters. The design covers graphic identity reflecting and corresponding with the featured art, unified by a theme and constructed and implied viewpoints which are explored in a number of ways throughout the museum’s, gallery’s or exhibition’s communications. The graphic identity should serve as a clear unifying visual language to connect all printed material including title cards, leaflets, catalogues and any exhibition graphics. It includes colors, distinctive forms, imagery, material and types, such as italics and reverse italics, suggestion of light and shadow, a play with positive and negative space, all with the goal to make the museum, art gallery or art event distinct and providing a high recognition value.

3.1.2.4. ARTIST-GALLERY RELATIONSHIP

3.1.2.4.1. ARTIST SELECTION

The selection of talents in the art world is based on three criteria:

  • The market,
  • Peers, and
  • Experts.

The “market” and “peer” systems are effective for relatively formalised, conservative artistic practices. It is foremost the quality, a pre-defined definition of quality and underlying proven criteria for judging quality, which form the basis for artists’ selection. For these systems it is complicated to identify real innovation as, at least in theory,

  • The market system will have difficulties in recognising innovative artwork, which is not in line with prevailing market evaluation criteria; and
  • The peer system will have a problem with innovation in art, which calls its fundamental points of reference into question.

In contrast, experts’ selection criteria seem to favour artistic innovation. The experts system is more open and allows art experts to identify new trends and recognise artists, who, in their opinion, are destined to play a role in art history before other market players do. Therefore, experts can establish a closer relationship to innovative artists, which allows them to play a more constructive role in achieving the artist’s recognition and in establishing an initial value for innovative artworks.

3.1.2.4.2. ARTIST-GALLERY COOPERATION

Successful artist-gallery relationships are built on mutual respect and understanding, trust and a general cooperative spirit.

The necessary relationship of trust presupposes that the artist and the gallery owner protect each other and value their respective work. The artist has a legitimate interest in the gallery owner making a lasting and not one-off effort to make him and his artworks known to the relevant public and the corresponding group of buyers.

It is a misconception to believe that art galleries are alone responsible for doing all the work and all the publicity for their artists’ shows. On the contrary, artists have to do more than just bringing in the art. Their active and ongoing participation and involvement is an essential part of any successful artist-gallery relationship. It will be in everyone’s interest if artists work alongside the galleries that represent them in each phase of the shows planning and implementation. every step of the way.

The better artists are informed about the gallery’s commercial and artistic concept, how professional art galleries work and what their constraints are, the greater the chances will be that their relationship with the gallery will be collaborative and successful.

Both parties need to be clear about their plans, concepts and expectations and fully transparent in their communications with each other. Otherwise conflicts may arise as a result of misunderstandings, errors and misinformation, which have the potential to generate an adversarial relationship which will not only have a negative impact on the personal relationship but potentially also on the success of the show. It is very difficult to imagine that a gallery will work against its own artists. A gallery would only be hurting itself, its reputation and track records of success if it did.

But bad communications can have a similar bad effect on a relationship although the gallery may believe that it is doing everything to maximize the success of the artists they represent.

To do this job properly, a gallery must be genuinely interested in an artist’s art understand it. It is the responsibility of artists to present their art clearly, effectively and understandably to facilitate the gallery’s job. Experienced gallery owners who continually see all kinds of art by all kinds of artists have normally acquired the skills necessary to bridge between the artist and interested gallery visitors and collectors.

3.1.3.6. ART AUDIENCE RECRUITMENT

The art audience is one of the foremost concerns of the curator.

A curator is not a creator but a facilitator for both the audience and the artists and a messenger who delivers ideas from contemporary society. A good curator needs to understand the audience and to fully communicate with the artists to let their work speak out to the public. Focus must be on the audience and what they could receive from the exhibition. The overriding concern is to allow for an audience interaction with the artwork.

One of the best things a communication practitioner can do is to build relationships and find out (to a reasonable extent) what individuals prefer. Some people like a phone call prefer an email an email.

Communication with culture itself is precisely what distinguishes it from consumption as well as from other, more commercial sectors. In the art sector “content” is created and shared but not “products” marketed or sold. For that reason, an art gallery has to adopt functional and effective communication strategies that establish dialogue by describing the content, instead of advertising, marketing and mere selling.

Against this background, the question must be asked, how a gallery will attract the attention of its relevant public and how does it achieve that people interested in the arts and art experts can be convinced in participating in the dialogue enabled by the gallery.

The most important condition to encourage participation in culture, in general, and in the gallery program, specifically, is direct and regular communication.

As communication has changed dramatically from conventional communication to a new mix of conventional and digital communication (read Guidebook: 1.3.2.1.; 1.3.3.2.; 1.3.4.2.; 3.3.1.1.; 4.1.; 8.1.1.8.), the way to recruiting attendees to an art event has changed dramatically with digitalization and the social media playing an increasingly important role.

For an art gallery, recruiting attendees is the benchmark value in measuring the return on investment (ROI), and the measurement starts with audience size.

Reaching and developing the proper audience/attendee list and number requires a communication strategy that corresponds with the type of event, the personality of the artist and the artwork he represents. In addition, it must be understood how the audiences to be recruited usually learn about (art-) events. This knowledge will help to tailor a communication strategy to do this most effectively.

For a gallery opening (vernissage) or an exhibition closure event (finissage), the tradition of mailing printed invitations accompanied by a matching RSVP card is challenged by online alternatives and, in most cases, replaced by email-based social-planning websites like EVITE (www.evite.com), which is creating, sending, and managing online invitations. 

Tools, which art event planners may use when recruiting an audience for an art event include:

  • Telemarketing. This may be the most effective method in reaching a target audience, but it is also the most expensive option,
  • Direct mails. But they are no longer widely used. They are costly may yield very little return on investment,
  • E-mail is probably the most economical method to reach the greatest number of people but one should know that recipients of e-mails are becoming less responsive to e-mails and there is little guarantee that the e-mail sent may end up in a SPAM filter and will not be seen. In addition, one could count that about 10% of the email data base is out of date after a few months already and a frustrating number of failure messages will flow back to the sender,
  • Social media are an economical approach to reaching a target audience. Their potential for creating a viral marketing campaign is great. For a social media campaign to be successful, building a social media presence online is important. This will help to establish a reputation for the art, the artist and the art gallery in question (read Guidebook 3.3.1.4.; 8.8.1.9. about website traffic).

3.1.2.5. ART GALLERY SOFTWARE

What an art gallery ideally wants is a fully integrated multi-platform and comprehensive software that provides a (cloud-based) data base:

  • To maintain an artist database,
  • That allows for customization,
  • Provides easy sharing,
  • Secures syncing abilities,
  • Which is compatible with existing software,
  • Provides the ability to create showrooms,
  • Allows for developing marketing email campaigns,
  • Which has catalogueing capabilities for artists and art collectors, Enables customer relationship management (CRM),
  • Provides iPad / iPhone sales applications,
  • Inventory management,
  • A sales pipeline,
  • Can generate invoices,
  • Track clients,
  • Does collectors exhibition & art fair list management.
  • Manages the inventory and consignments,
  • Does accounting, and
  • Enables the development and management of websites and online marketing & sales promotion and sales. 

3.1.3. ART COMMUNICATION TOOLS

3.1.3.1. ARTIST STATEMENT

For an artist, the first task is to write an artist statement, which will serve as basis for any written or oral communication.

The artist statement can be best compared with a so-called elevator pitch, which, in the business world, is a very short 30-second sales speech selling the product offered.

For an artist, the elevator pitch is targeted at his main audiences, i.e. art gallery managers, collectors, art journalists and art critics (read Guidebook: 3.2.2.2.; . The art of preparing an appealing elevator pitch is to create a way (or a “hook”, read Guidebook: 1.3.5.2; 8.4.7.9.) for attracting the attention of the target person. This could be the artist’s specific niche in which he is working, a unique (new) message, a compelling history of past work or exhibitions, cutting-edge technique used, interesting materials or a totally new concept of art. 

3.1.3.2. IMAGES IN PRINT AND ONLINE

Great imagery will get an art gallery’s story across when added to the gallery’s online presence, in online and print communications, in particular press releases (read Guidebook: 1.2.; 8.1.1.) Ideally, a museum or art gallery should use a wide-angle photo of the venue to convey the scale of the display. Close-up photos are not helpful unless the object shown represents the central message of the exhibition. Best for publication purposes will be a selection of photos of the venue, the objects, and possibly the people involved.

3.1.3.3. CONVENTIONAL COMMUNICATION TOOLS

3.1.3.3.1. DIALOGUE

A gallery’s press release or social media press release (SMPR, read Guidebook: 1.3.1.; 1.3.1.7.; 2.9.6.; 3.3.3.; 8.8.1.10.) should be seen as the start of the communication process and not the end. For this reason, a press release should be designed to enable follow-up communications (dialogue) and allow the building of good professional relationships with journalists based on mutual respect and trust.

3.1.3.3.2. PRESS (NEWS) RELEASE

A press release is a way of presenting the salient information to journalists in the first instance. But frequently, there is the potential for them to have a much wider audience and are often posted word for word for anyone to see. Therefore all rules about the avoidance of jargon (read Guidebook: 3.2.4.1.; 3.2.4.2.), recipient perspective (read Guidebook: 2.2.2.; 3.2.4.1) and all other general rules for writing effective press releases apply (read Guidebook: 3.2.4.1.; 7.11.4.2.; 8.8.1.5.).

3.1.3.3.3. PRESS (NEWS) CONFERENCE (read Guidebook: 3.2.4.2.; 7.11.4.2.; 7.11.4.3.; 4.)

 

In preparation of an art exhibition a pre-opening press conference should be held. At the press conference, complete press kits should be made available that contain written texts explaining the show’s concept, the list of the artists, informative background on the artists’ work, their professional history and a USB stick with selected images, a detailed text (Word document not PDF to allow for easy editing, reference) and, if relevant, good sound bites for publication. The gallery manager should moderate the press conference and introduce the curator and the artists who have to say a few words. He should allow for a short Qs&As session involving the artist. For more details on organising and running a press conference read Guidebook 3.2.4.2.; 7.11.4.2.; 7.11.4.3.; 4.

 

3.1.3.3.4. INTERVIEWS / TALKSHOWS (read Guidebook: 3.2.6.)

 

The gallery can also promote the artist and / or the curator for participating in relevant talk-shows or in interviews for local media (for more details read reference).

 

In addition, the gallery has the opportunity to commission pieces of writing, podcasts and blogs, preferably posted by well-regarded social influencers  (for more details read).

 

These communication platforms will allow for effectively contextualizing the artist’s work. 

3.1.4.3.5. REVIEWS

The rise of the social media has not made art reviews abundant. On the contrary, art reviews will continue to be import as restaurant or hotel reviews are. The emergence of the social media has only resulted in evolving the character of art reviews. In the past, an art or gallery manager was keen on receiving good reviews of his art show in the daily newspaper. At present, art reviews (printed or online, e.g. in a blog) are more about offering diverse standpoints, discussion, providing background, contextualise and highlighting broader perspectives relating to the art presented. Today, it is more about creating a dialogue than teaching. Giving those people interested in the arts additional reasons to want to come to the gallery, exhibition or art fair booth is the most important goal of such communication.

The art or gallery manager must recognise that art reviews cannot be influenced. Under no circumstances he can expect or request the reviewer to write a positive review. There are no deals and to request that reviews be taken down if they are not wholly positive is a no-go. All people involved on the artist’s side must accept the integrity of the reviewer and allow him to give an honest appraisal of the show.

3.1.4.4. ONLINE TOOLS

3.1.4.4.1. SOCIAL MEDIA

When a gallery choses to run a social media campaign, the right people and the right social networks must be selected (read more reference). Facebook, LinkedIN, Instagram and Twitter offer a lot of opportunities but there may be alternative, more effective platforms that the gallery can utilize. The gallery has to select those channels in which their key target audiences and potential new audiences are active.

One way to identify the right people is to developing and keeping the profiles of potentially interested people art-industry-specific (for example by using LinkedIn’s group “Art Professionals Worldwide Noenga®”).

Part of this approach is to establish connections with art journalists, art experts, art critics, art foundations and other institutions active in the art domain.

There are a number of programs, which enable galleries to personalize the communication and to avoid generic communication. Particularly in the art world, people are hyper-sensitive as regards mass communication / mailings and it will be advantageous to opt for personalised communication. Otherwise the chances to miss on the opportunity to connect with and attract interested people is great.

An important tool when using social media channels is the “word of mouth”. Its power has not lost as a result of online communication but increased. A gallery, which encourages others to pass on their message are very likely doing right.

For instance, on Twitter, every Tweet or press release released via Twitter has the potential to generate interest in an art show or an art event or an artist and can be re-tweeted, get commented on, or cause a discussion amongst other tweeters who are interested in the arts or this particular artist or show. Twitter hashtags used to aggregate Tweets about a specific art event, exhibition or artist can so become an effective way of showing people who else in the community is talking about something they are interested in, and thus building a small one-interest community around it. Read Guidebook:2.5.2.3.;3.2.9.3.; 3.3.2.5.; 4.4.2.7.; 6.3.4.6.; 8.9.6.1..

3.1.4.4.2. WEBSITE / BLOG / PODCAST

The use of online channels and tools is discussed in much detail in the Guidebook.

  • Websites: 1.3.; 3.3.1.3.; 8.4.7.9.; 8.8.1.9.; 8.10.6.1.; 9.5.2.
  • Podcasts: 3.3.4.1.; 8.4.7.6.
  • Blogs: 3.3.4.2.; 4.4.2.6.; 8.7.4.6.;8.10.6.1.; 9.2.5.

For any online communication, it needs to be remembered that always a link to the press release as well as possible twitter info on #howtofollow must be included and low resolution images must be made available (read Guidebook: 1.4.2.2.).  

3.1.4.4.3. LIVE VIDEO STREAMING

A contemporary new social media tool in gallery communication / promotion is live video streaming, which gives the gallery an opportunity to hold Qs & As sessions or give interested parties an inside view into the artist’s work, his work processes and even a glimpse into his studio.

Tools like “PERISCOPE” enable such live streaming even with the participation of the audience. This tool is recommended as in general, and increasingly, people love behind the scenes footage (remember the growing success of “the making of”…footage in the movie and TV-industries). In contrast, pre-recorded video clips do not offer that possibility. “PERISCOPE” makes it very easy to do that kind of “look behind the scenes”. In particular it makes it possible to tailor the content to appeal to a specific target group and thus help building an audience or community, which the gallery can connect with again at other, following occasions.

Video live streaming also enables modifications “on the go”, based on the audience’s feedback received during the live stream.

3.1.4.4.4. HASHTAGS

Hashtags are powerful tools for increasing the scope of messages in certain social media (read Guidebook: 3.3.2.5.; 8.4.7.8.; 8.4.7.9.). A good idea for a gallery may be to identify the Facebook, Twitter and Instagram hashtags that people follow who are art experts or art lovers interested in news from the art world.

3.1.4.4.5. LinkedIn PROFILE

LinkedIn (read Guidebook: 2.5.2.3.)has an important number of specialized groups or communities that attract interest in specific fields, including the arts. Art gallery activity in art groups or groups that are relevant for the art market make it easier for the gallery to identify and attract the right people (see above). 

Another option is “LinkedIn PULSE”, which give an opportunity to publish an article on any topic of interest to art professionals and art lovers. The article can be highly specialized, provide background on the artist and / or his art style or linked to a specific gallery event or exhibition. High quality “PULSE” publications are published in the relevant LinkedIn groups, which increases their reach and fosters more target audience feedback.

For instance, the use of “LinkedIn PULSE” can help the art gallery to clearly position itself and its program in the complex art world (see above). This can be helpful for the gallery to achieve one of its prime goals in an overcrowded market: Building the right reputation, creating an interesting image and showing its record.

This will assist the gallery in

  • Attracting artists and customers effectively,
  • Maximizing its recognition in the art market and in the artists’ community,
  • Establishing itself as an expert and / or influencer in the respective art segment, and
  • Make it much easier for the gallery to connect with top talents and art collectors.

3.1.4.4.6. INSTAGRAM

Instagram is an image oriented platform and therefore Instagram is a preferred medium for connecting with people particularly interested in the arts. A strategic selection of images can make it easier to reach in particular Millennials (read Guidebook: 2.5.1.2.), who generally strongly react to an emotional connection, which can be created by a relevant and appealing story combined with attractive images. Millennials are the group of people mostly used to looking for online information. Compared to their predecessors the Millennial generation has more specific needs and preferences and the visual character of Instagram is helping them in particular. This is beneficial for the in the arts sector which is living from images of any kind. For these reasons, an effective presentation covering the art’s / artist’s story and values, beefed up by images can become very important to trigger this specific target group’s interest.

EXAMPLE: One can show pictures around the artist’s studio, the gallery, show the work done in preparation of the exhibition opening, present photos and audio-visuals of the artist–art gallery dialogue and refer to other events. A short video clip could even create more interest than a simple picture. The purpose of the gallery’s Instagram presentation will be to show the Millennial crowd how it is to collaborate with an exhibiting artist.

Once, prior to and in preparation for the artist show, an Instagram following is built for the gallery and / or the artist in question and when connecting with the right people has commenced (see above), the art gallery can post an announcement for the planned exhibition. Accompanying the announcement, with the right hashtags in place, attractive images typical for the artist’s work can help maximizing the reach of the message and even go viral. Since Instagram is more informal than, for example, LinkedIn there is quiet a lot of freedom when it comes to announcing the gallery news.

3.1.4.4.7. SOCIAL MEDIA ADVERTISING (read Guidebook: 3.3.5.4.)

If the non-commercial social media efforts fail delivering the desired results, and provided there is enough budget, a paid advertising campaign should be considered by the art gallery.

Advertising is quite similar to the paid inclusions in Google search. All social media channels such as LinkedIn, Instagram, Facebook and Twitter offer the chance to place reasonably priced paid ads for maximum reach and thus become an affordable option for reaching the right audiences.

The systems are generally flexible and allow a trial phase, modifications and discontinuation in case the results are not as desired. One can optimize the demographic profiles of the audiences, the message and the budget any time.

It should be mentioned that paid LinkedIn advertising can be more expensive than publishing ads on social media like Facebook or Instagram. Still, the business-oriented nature of the LinkedIn probably justifies spending a little bit more in order to connect with professional in the art and art collectors’ field.

Generally, an art gallery communication campaign that will bring together multiple social channels will be the one that will deliver the best results in terms of both targeting, reach and recognition.

3.1.5. ART GALLERY EXHIBITIONS

3.1.5.1. PLANNING & ORGANIZATION

3.1.5.1.1. PLANNING

When planning an art event (the same applies for all other events, read reference), first and foremost nothing should be assumed and nothing should be left to chance. A well-organised plan requires a lot of preliminary work, some research, a concept, an allocation of responsibilities and a realistic timetable for structuring and controlling the implementation of the plan.

3.1.5.1.1.1. TECHNICAL

It should be clear in particular from the very beginning who is responsible for contributing, managing, delivering and paying for what: Packing, freight, artist travel expenses (if any), installation, dismantling, the curator’s fees and expenses, possibly translation costs, catalogue and flyer / poster design and printing, press contacts and briefings, media kit, and all other marketing activities. Insurance cost and potential customs duties need to be accounted for. 

There are two extra cost items, which are particularly sensitive as they may get overlooked:

  • Unexpected customs duties and importation delays) (if the artist lives and works in a foreign country and has to import his works), and
  • Insurance.

As regards the latter, it must be ensured that there is a written confirmation of insurance before the artist’s works take to the road.

3.1.5.1.1.2. CONCEPTIONAL

The art gallery has to think of the idea and overall theme for an artist’s exhibition. A good preparatory exercise is to write a mission statement (read Guidebook: 2.1.2.1.; 7.16.2.6.; 8.1.4.). This forces the planner to exercise a certain discipline, which can become helpful in case of the emergence of unexpected developments.

The mission statement should ideally cover the following items: 

What is the (art gallery’s) motivation and the purpose of the exhibition, for example:

  • A show of progress made by an established artist,
  • A showcase of a new talent,
  • A cross-cultural exchange,
  • An illustration of a theme or topical issue.

A gallery which is operating in a foreign environment with a predominantly different culture, mentality and appreciation of art must engage in researching the country’s artists and audience, to understand the environment it is working in and what subsequent issues may arise.

EXAMPLE: Working as a curator in Asia is different from working in the West in that the social context is perceived as a “totally money-driven phenomenon.”

Other elements of a mission statement should include:

  • An explanation for the choice of location of the exhibition site, for instance, a museum or an art gallery,
  • The rational for the choice of an alternative venue for the exhibition such as a public park or a shopping arcade (see chapter POPUP) versus a traditional gallery space,
  • The positioning of the exhibiting artists in a relevant art movement and the artists’ contribution to progress made in such movement,
  • Accepted sponsorship and its rationale and possible conditions.

Other and some more technical considerations must be given to:

  • Using floor plans and starting mapping out the layout of the exhibition (this includes building 3D-models of the gallery space and artworks. Some art galleries use software like “SketchUp”).
  • Ensuring a logical flow between the exhibited artworks and a critical check on whether the audience will understand the message or the rationale of what was tried to be conveyed,
  • Creating possible intriguing juxtapositions between artworks,
  • Creating a dialogue amongst the artworks and the audience,

EXAMPLE: An artist exhibiting autobiographical images, as a reflection of his adventurous life, was not sure whether the viewers would understand the very personal situations, which he was covering in his artwork. He therefore produced poems corresponding with each piece, which, in an ironic way, commented and on / or explained the scene reflected in his work. The viewers were interested in what they heard and engaged the artist in an unusual conversation.    

The opening and closing dates of the art exhibition have to be set up well in advance to allow a positive and productive environment for all involved.

The gallery calendar must be marked with deadlines for each element of the planned project. In most cases it will be helpful to work backward from the planned opening date and schedule the necessary implementation steps needed to put on the exhibition.

The planning, organisation and implementation experience must be kept as stress-free as possible by having everything planned out beforehand. In some cases, a contingency planning is recommended when there are risks involved, which the gallery cannot influence.

EXAMPLE 1: The artist selected for the exhibition is unreliable, moody and capricious.

EXAMPLE 2: The artist is scheduled to make a performance. In the last minute, the hosting gallery receives the bad news that the artist is prevented from coming.

Fall-backs have to be developed in these cases for keeping the audience happy, safeguard the gallery’s reputation and maintaining the audience’s interest in the artist’s work.

3.1.5.1.2. CURATION

Gallery managers want to maintain their flexibility in deciding what to show and which artist or art movement to represent. Normally they do not agree to show whatever works of art the artists in question want them to show. They want to curate the art. Based on their experience, location and socio-economic customer data gallery managers want to and can decide on:

  • What works best for the gallery,
  • What their collectors tend to prefer, and
  • How to organize and present art in compelling and effective ways.

To curate an exhibition, one does not need to be an art historian or museum staff member to curate an art exhibition.

Today, a curator’s job is like a movie director’s job. He needs to oversee every planned detail of the production (i.e the show), including small details which can turn out to be important once the exhibition is running (for example the hanging / positioning of paintings in the gallery space, or the time at which an art performance will start).

In principle, an art curator needs to be sensitive to people (who may turn out to be difficult because of their egos), extremely well organized in terms of detailed planning, flexible and determined at the same time when getting confronted with individual wishes by the artist and the gallery manager and others in the process of implementing his plan at the gallery. In addition, a curator needs to cooperate well with people and motivate his collaborators as it takes many skilled people to put on an exhibition.

A curator may develop a concept for the exhibition, but at the same time, and in consideration of the very individualistic character of the art industry, he has to accept that there he cannot follow a one-size-fits-all approach, but has to be flexible and open to various approaches and methods.

3.1.5.1.3. ARTIST SELECTION

Of course, there is no advice from a communication standpoint, which one can give to an art gallery or a curator engaging in putting an exhibition or an art trade fair show together and managing it during and after the opening. But there are some items, which should not be overlooked when concerned with the effectiveness of gallery communication:

  • Will the artist make new works, which will be added to the gallery’s   budget or will the artist exhibit older works?
  • Has the gallery decided to work entirely with local artists?
  • If not, will the gallery need to arrange for travel and accommodation cost and visa for visiting artists?
  • Will the gallery accept “in-residence” artists in return for an exclusive exhibition of the works produced by the artists during their stay at the gallery?
  • Assumed the talented artist’s origin is from a poor or politically oppressed country, will the gallery provide accommodation, a studio, paints, canvases, frames and other material and will the gallery be prepared to acquire the completed artworks from the artist for a fair price upon the artist’s departure?   

3.1.5.1.4. NARRATIVE AND CATALOGUE

For an art curator, writing is a necessary professional skill. Publishing a narrative for the artist’s work or a catalogue of the exhibition are the tasks involved when curating an art show. This is particularly important when the artist is unknown to the art community or when the artist’s work requires some explanation to be appreciated. A narrative can help to translate complicated artistic messages into intelligible language, which can be appreciated by a broader public. A catalogue provides a great documentation of the artist’s work and offers a promotional tool that can lead to future artistic projects.

In some situations, a curator may have to be careful when writing texts about what he is writing because there are political censorship, ideological restrictions or religious sensitivities.

In countries where censorship is an issue, a text writer must know or must be specially briefed by insiders on what is likely to get him into trouble.

Even a country like the United States of America which is perceived as “free”, the so-called “political correctness” concept, when applied strictly, can turn out to be like real censorship or, even worst, self-censorship (read Guidebook: 1.3.7.) . 

3.1.5.1.5. INVITATIONS AND ADVERTISEMENTS

For galleries, which want to make an artist’s exhibition a memorable event, the key is to get the word out, whatever the means are. They can use certain tools to maximize the attendance for the event, the most conventional being mail / snail-mail, and e-mail the printed invitation for the exhibition to all the people on their data bank and beyond.

In addition, flyers can be handed out and key people such as journalists and collectors who are wanted to attend the opening can be contacted by various means including personal telephone calls.

In the rare case budget / sponsorship is available, advertisements in newspapers, art magazines and on the Internet, broadcast announcements on the radio and TV, street flags displays and pay for public transport ads can be considered.

3.1.5.1.6. SITE INSTALLATION

Site installation is a key task when curating an art show. Typically one week before the opening, the gallery team will need to do the on-site installation, which includes the painting of walls and, if required, the construction of extra walls or furniture. The gallery team, with the assistance and under the advice of the artists, will install the artwork, and the technicians will set up the lighting and technical equipment, if needed.

3.1.5.1.7. INTERACTIVE TECHNOLOGIES

Interactive communication means make it more engaging and fun to visit an art exhibition with interactive communication than traditional exhibitions.

Many art gallery visitors are not able to tell the difference between art works and the communication of the art works. When art gallery visitors cannot tell the difference between art and art communication then the interactive technology has blurred the distinction between the art work and art communication and successfully created a coherent holistic experience of the artwork and the interactive installations.

Many of the visitors will believe that not the curator or the technology design team have done the technical installations but the artist.

There are some new approaches to interaction design for communication of art in art galleries and museum space. When introducing technology to art galleries and museums, the challenge is that technology must enhance and support the presentation of the exhibited art without disturbing the specific individual and unique character of the artworks.

Traditional touch screen and audio guide interfaces, mainly used in museums, typically apply button and menu based interaction. This requires users to focus and concentrate on the selection of relevant items in the interface and will distract them from the art.

To avoid this the body can be used as the only interaction device.

Art gallery visitors usually perceive exhibition and (interactive) communication as a holistic visitor experience. The technical installations must not disturb, distract or even compete with the artwork but enhance their perception by the gallery visitor. More importantly, these means of communication must neither isolate the individual visitor nor make him detached from the actual art experience.

For art gallery visitors the interactive installations are a playful exploration of the artist’s inspirational material. The use of interactive technology for the communication of art may also appeal to young people who make their first experiences with the arts and, if positive, make them more willing to continue exploring art and experiencing art events.

There are three main approaches in the interactive technology communication of art:

  • AUDIO AUGMENTATION of exhibited art works,
  • Remote and INTERACTIVE INSTALLATIONS in conceptual affinity to the art works,
  • The QUICK RESPONSE CODE (QR code). The OR code is a type of matrix barcode (or two-dimensional barcode), which is a machine-readable optical label that contains information about the item to which it is attached. It usually redirects the user to a website or application.

3.1.5.1.7.1. AUDIO AUGMENTATION

Audio augmentation of art works is easy to grasp and provides a useful supplement to the exhibited art. Different to headphones, which only provide a single user experience and have the problem of depraving the user from being aware of conversations or sounds in the nearby environment, the gentle audio augmentation does not suffer from these disadvantages as they use of sensor controlled directional loudspeakers (sound spots).

The audio spots utilize a coarse grained PIR sensor to detect the appearance of a visitor within a silver circle marked on the floor. The sound spots are located in the exhibition next to the art works. The visitor’s movement into the spot triggers played back recordings with clips of the artist’s voice gently supplementing the artworks, for example reading texts or poems. When the clip is finished a slight movement will invoke the next audio clip in a random sequence.

The communication becomes an integral part of the art experience. By choosing the artist’s voice instead of a distanced narrator’s voice enhances a notion of integration.

Other people can share the audio spots by putting their heads together in the listening zone, and experiencing they will find them to be an exciting manner of gaining knowledge of the art works and the artist.

3.1.5.1.7.2. INTERACTIVE INSTALLATIONS

The gallery needs a separate room, which can be used as a  “contemplation room” in which interactive installations are communicating the sources of inspiration behind the exhibited works.

Although the contemplation installations are physically detached from the art works they refer to, they provide a clear reference to the art works by displaying inspirational material behind the given artwork. This arrangement creates an affinity between the artwork and the interactive installation.

The “contemplation room installation” differs from the “gentle audio augmentation” in that the latter is more an integrated part of the exhibition.

3.1.5.1.7.3. THE QUICK RESPONSE CODE (QR CODE)

The gallery can provide a QR code, which will direct the visitor to a specific page on the gallery’s website which will contain additional information, background or other accompanying material to make the art lover’s visit of the gallery more informative and enjoyable.

EXAMPLE: An exhibiting artist had created a poem for each of his works. Instead of printing the poem and attaching it to the wall next to the exhibited work (thus distracting the visitor from viewing the work), the gallery made the poems available on its website and gave the visitor the option to download and read them via QR code. Especially members of the younger generations have accepted and used the offer of the gallery with great willingness.

3.1.5.1.8. MUSEUMS ARE DIFFERENT (read about communications for museums: Guidebook: 8.8.1.13.)

In art museums, the artworks should constitute the main visitor experience and not their presentation. Therefore, for art museums, a main issue in the communication strategy is to avoid disturbing the pure art experience with the communication means selected (e.g. projections, audio or video installations and the like). This traditionally has only left room for small discrete signs, a catalogue, or perhaps an audio guide explaining about the artist and his work.

3.1.5.1.9. POP-UPS

Art galleries can opt to move their exhibition into empty or otherwise available spaces in industrial areas or on the high street for short periods of time. These pop-up experiences are an interesting way for galleries to provide an interesting “canvas” environment for their artists’, immerse themselves within the ‘everyday’ life of an area, and encourage a completely different audience.

3.1.5.2. EXHIBITION MANAGEMENT

3.1.5.2.1. GRAND OPENING (read Guidebook: 8.4. about event communication)

The (grand) opening of an art exhibition (vernissage) should be exciting, fun and memorable for all participants. The gallery should strive for creating an exciting buzz so that people will keep coming back for the exhibition. The opening for the evening should be scheduled when most people are free to attend and not collide with public holidays, long weekends and the like. Also, the timing of the opening and subsequent opening hours should consider the work schedule of the majority of the people and avoid business rush hours.

The opening can be silent and completely focus on the viewing of the art, and / or with introductory speeches by the artist, the curator and other significant figures, with a live art or music performance or light or any other show related to the art and the show’s character. Generally, the gallery will be responsible for serving some refreshments and let the visitors see the artwork in peace. The artist (when present) should be near his works so he can answer any of the visitors’ questions.

3.1.5.2.2. GIVE AS MANY REASONS TO VISIT AS POSSIBLE 

The gallery should give as many reasons to visit the exhibition as possible. 

  • Live performances,
  • Guided tours,
  • Recitals and readings,
  • Night time openings,
  • Educational hands-on workshops,
  • Panel discussions with experts and the artist,
  • Exclusive VIP-visits,
  • How-to-explanations by the artist,
  • (Artist cooked) art dinner or suppers,
  • Involvement of local art professors and their students,
  • Lectures,
  • Local community gatherings with walk-in hours and even activities for families, if appropriate,
  • Invitations to expatriate groups, Lion’s and Rotary Club members, representatives from Chamber of Commerces, embassies (cultural attachés),
  • Cultural institutions and foundations in the art field.

All options need to be considered to attract visitors. However, the gallery must also remember that all marketing efforts should remain there should be done within the limits of appropriate decency because an art gallery is different from a shop or supermarket.

During the opening week, when interest in the exhibition is high, the gallery can invite local art school professors and their students to get special viewings accompanied by lectures.

 

The gallery can also chose to engage local community institutions by organising special viewings, walking tours and hands-on workshops.

In general, a thoughtful, pre-planned program can maintain a high interest level by keeping the ball moving, generate its own momentum and will make the gallery a local cultural “hot spot” that people will be attracted to and happy to visit.  

3.1.6. ONLINE SALES

Viewing and buying art online is one a serious growth area of the Internet. Today, and probably even more in the future, and in common with other areas such as the luxury sector, consumers are increasingly prepared to pay more online than ever before. Top-end purchases still seem to be transacted offline but the important auction houses are using already more online technologies to transact than in the years before.

4. PRICING COMMUNICATION

The price of an artwork is set by the gallery based on the artwork’s intrinsic and extrinsic characteristics in consideration of the artist’s current or projected importance.

There are a few things to consider:

  • The research of comparable artists (in terms of experience exhibiting and selling, and medium/style),
  • Market test results,
  • Established prices; and
  • Price consistency (artwork should be sold at the same price across the board at galleries, open studio events and art fairs).

Amongst other factors,

  • The reputation, originality, creativity and uniqueness of the artist,
  • The relation to the prevailing “zeitgeist” (reference),
  • The techniques, the materials and the medium,
  • The size of the art work, and
  • Possibly the time needed to create the artwork,

must be taken into account when defining the ultimate price for an art piece.

5. ART SALES COMMUNICATION

While there are many elements to a successful sale, the process itself is simple once the art gallery / art sellers understands their role.

It is correct that art will generate interest by itself (“the art will sell itself”), but it is much more likely to sell well if the right things will be said and done during the sales process. .

5.1. SALES PROCESS

It is an error to believe that good art sells itself and galleries are just showrooms for the exhibition of the artist’s artwork and that all what gallery owners do is sit around and wait for people to come in and buy.

Art is a product that has no tangible value, it is generally expensive and serves no practical purpose. Therefore, no art sells itself and selling art is anything but easy.

Most gallery owners will have made the experience that there is a huge difference between a gallery visitor liking a work of art and buying it. That difference is called selling process. Art galleries are more than just moneymaking selling machines. Therefore, it is not correct to assume that art galleries only show art that is easily saleable.

A serious art gallery has a concept on which it is basing its business including the selection of art style and artists’ orientations. Many art galleries take pride in bringing new art movements and new artists to the attention of the public, and some have even positioned themselves explicitly as avant-garde galleries. To do this, these art galleries must believe in the artists they show, in the validity and credibility of their art, its revolutionary and / or trendsetting character and they must be convinced that the interested public deserves to see it, irrespective of buying patterns and regardless of prospects they ultimately will end up selling or not.

5.1.1. BUYERS’ INDEPENDENCE

While it is important to engage potential buyers and tell them a story about the art, it is also critical to give them some space for reflection. A good gallery manager will not impose himself on a potential buyer. Ideally, he will introduce himself, start to get to know the potential buyer, and then step back to let him look at the art.

When the potential buyer pause in front of a particular piece, it can be helpful if the gallery manager asks politely whether he can be of any help and tell something about the work and the artist, before stepping back again to let the potential buyer think. This is especially important when working with a group of people or a couple. The gallery manager will want to allow them to discuss the art without feeling like he is hovering over them.

Giving customers space is easy in a gallery setting, but even in a small booth at a weekend art show, or in an artist’s studio, the seller must find a way to back off enough to give clients some privacy. He might even have to step several meters out of the booth, or go to another room of the studio to provide that feeling.

Before making a purchase, many buyers want to discuss the decision. They want to know for sure that spouses or partners feel the same about the art that they do. It is advisable to better give them some space than to have them wait until they leave to have a frank discussion.

5.1.2. SALES PUSH

Many artists and gallery staff think they should be doing most of the talking with an interested visitor with the goal to sell. Actually the opposite is true.

Also, too often both artists and galleries are concentrating so hard on that mythical “serious” collector that they completely overlook the opportunity to foster the potential interest from “normal” people visiting the art gallery. This does not mean that the gallery manager and his staff should not be aware of the opportunity to sell, if it exists. On the contrary, they have to consider that so-called “serious” collectors were once first-time buyers with no acquisition history.

The best way for a gallery manager to get to know more about a visitor is to get him talking about himself and to invite for questions. As a result of the resulting dialogue, the gallery manager will learn that the visitor has well-defined or vague interests, passions, expectations and preferences. This understanding will enable the gallery manager to help the visitor developing an understanding and appreciation of the artist and his artwork, its position in prevailing art movements, the value and the price.

In contrast to an aggressive ”sales push” is demonstrated disinterest by the gallery team towards an interested visitor. This approach can be a result of lack of sales and marketing training, psychological failure, misjudgements or simply arrogance. When an interested art lover feels be left alone, ignored or not appreciated he may turn his back on the gallery and never come back.

EXAMPLE 1: An art lover visited an art gallery to attend the opening of the solo-exhibition by a well-known artist. He got interested in a specific artwork and approached the gallery manager for more information about the artist and the piece of art he had singled out. The gallery manager referred him to a gallery aide, as she was busy eating food, which had just been delivered for her and some personal friends. The gallery aide was not able to answer all of the art lover’s questions satisfactorily and promised to send detailed information by email. Although the art lover was a bit confused, he provided his contact details and left the gallery. The information promised by the aide never arrived. The art lover did not appreciate the demonstrated lack of interest by the gallery and abstained from following up on his inquiry. No sale was made.

5.1.3. COMMUNICATION UPON ART SALE CLOSURE

Even in the more complex art business, is the sales process is governed by certain general rules. Salesmanship is requiring certain skills, which can be learned.

EXAMPLE: At the opening of a group art show, one artist photographer excelled the other artists by selling three artworks within the first 30 minutes of the show. Proudly he saw how the gallery manager put the famous red stickers to the wall next to the framed works. The other artists at the group show looked at him with a certain jealousy at their colleague as they didn’t manage to get any of the much-desired red stickers. Two weeks later, at the end of the show, the collector who had bought the three works at the opening backed off from the deal and let the gallery manager know that he had decided otherwise. Both the artist and the gallery owner were disappointed.  

Many art sales are lost simply because the artist or gallery manager did not come right out and ask for the sale.

EXAMPLE: A collector visited a gallery opening. After talking at length with the artist, he decided to make a reservation for an artwork, which interested him most. The artist introduced him to the gallery manager who noted the art collector’s contact details and promised to contact him after the exhibition was closed. This contact never took place. The piece of art remained unsold.

Asking buyers to commit can seem a little obtrusively at first and the gallery might feel like taking a risk by asking. However, the risk is far greater if the gallery does not try to close the sale. A visitor who loves an art piece might not end up buying simply because he was not given the opportunity. Even when an art gallery visitor’s response is negative the gallery will be in a better position than no question would have been asked. Once the situation has been clarified, the gallery can find out why the visitor does not want to buy, make alternative offers based on the visitor’s preferences or help the visitor overcoming any obstacles that might be in the way.

———————————————————————–

On all general and some specific communication issues, more or more detailed information can be found in the author’s standard-setting guide book: “Present-Day Corporate Communication“ (www.public-relations-pro.com).

Copyright Rudolf Beger 11 January 2019.

Posted on

MISINFORMATION IN COMMUNICATION: “The False Clean Electric-Car Promise” by Rudolf Beger

In my book“Present-Day Corporate Communication” (www.public-relations-pro.com),I discuss in some detail how to manage untrue information such as #misinformation, #disinformation, #fakenews, alternative facts, and the like.

THE E-CAR MODEL CASE

The e-car issue is a model case for wide spread misinformation to which the public, governments, policy- and lawmakers and the media are subjected.  In fact, the e-car and e-mobility have an image problem, which should be of interest – not only to communication practitioners, but also to other interested parties, in particular governments:

  • Governments because they may introduce policies, that will point into the wrong direction,
  • Communication practitioners because they can learn from this particular (alternative) case.

The case is particular, because in this case, and different to common experience in corporate communication, not a good image needs to be developed or defended, but an image must be corrected, which is simply too good. The German Federal Motor Transport Authority has made a statement which best describes the prevailing good reputation of e-mobility in public, with governments and large parts of the media. The agency has officially said that purely electrically powered cars do not emit any carbon dioxide. That is untrue or even worst it is a political fiction. No serious life cycle assessment supports the information that electric vehicles are climate-neutral.

DISINFORMATION OR MISINFORMATION

There are no indications that this is a disinformation. Disinformation is commonly defined as untrue communication, which is purposefully spread (for example by deliberately creating rumours or for political reasons). Typically,disinformation is represented as truth in order to influence public opinion or obscure the truth to serve the perpetrator’s (hidden) purpose. In this case, however, one has to assume that we have to deal with misinformation. Like disinformation, misinformation is also false, but it is presented as truth only because the communicator does not have the facts straight and,probably unwillingly, creates an alternative truth (To learn more about untrue information,please read Rudolf Beger’s new guidebook on “Present-Day Corporate Communication”, www.public-relations-pro.com).

Those who assume that e-cars do not produce any emissions almost always make the same mistake to assume that the e-vehicle is exclusively fuelled with clean electricity, i.e. electricity produced from renewable sources such as wind, solar, or water. Those people who fuel the erroneously good reputation of e-mobility, have probably never asked where the energy used to propel e-cars is coming from. Contrary to widespread popular belief, electricity does not come from the plug. It is typically produced in a power plant.  Fact is that most power plants all over the world are mainly coal and gas-fired. The climate impact of these plants is only reduced, not eliminated, by wind turbines, solar parks and other alternatives. Nuclear power plants are clean in terms of carbon dioxide emissions but have there own set of problems. This fact means that e-mobility may make air in the cities and conurbations cleaner but moves pollution from the city to distant power plants. For the world climate, it does not make any difference where the CO2 is produced as long as it is produced somewhere, it will have its negative impact on our climate and health.  

THE CRUEL E-CAR FACTS

The question whether e-cars offer an ecological advantage over their entire life cycle over vehicles with conventional combustion engines can only be answered when many factors are taken into account. Neutral life-cycle assessments of e-vehicles and e-mobility suggest that the e-car’s energy balance sheet is negative. In other words, e-mobility produces more environmental problems as it is supposed to avoid. In addition to the origin of electricity, such life-cycle assessment has to be take the following factors into account (list is not comprehensive):

  • The construction of an e-car, especially the production of its battery, requires an effort that does not occur with any conventional car. During production about twice as much carbon dioxide is released as for a conventional comparable product. This difference is mainly due to the batteries. This means that even before hitting the road, an e-car has already done more damage to the climate than the diesel or petrol engine alternative.
  • Battery factories consume a lot of electricity when processing the raw materials and assembling the storage cells. The fact that many batteries currently come from China, where a lot of electricity flows into the grid from inefficient coal-fired power plants, puts a strain on the energy balance of e-cars. The large CO2 emissions during battery production in Asian countries, especially China, have a negative impact. Greenhouse gases change the climate completely independently of political borders.
  • The climate at the place of use of the e-car is another factor in assessing its energy efficiency. In cold countries,the heating and blowers of a car are heavily used. In an e-car this is always at the expense of the battery. In contrast, in a conventional car the necessary heat is a waste product.
  • A further disadvantage is if electric cars are charged at the wrong time as soon as there are millions of vehicles. Increased energy demand at a time when little renewable electricity is available can have a negative impact on the electricity mix.
  • There are other sources of pollution, which an e-car produces. Therefore, it is an illusion that the mass introduction of e-cars will make cities and conurbations free from pollution.E-cars release particle pollution into the air from wearing tyres, brakes and road surfaces. It is said that today, more particle pollution comes from wear than from the exhausts of modern vehicles. Open disc brakes rather than sealed drums look to be making the situation worse.
  • The extra weight of the batteries (200-300 kg) means more particle pollution compared with the petrol or diesel vehicles that we buy today.
  • The race to develop improved battery technology is not simply a question of finding ways to make electric vehicles easier to charge and more convenient to drive over long distances. It is also a question of weight, size and recyclability. A major issue in particular is the weight. A lot of energy is used just to move the battery especially when the vehicle is used for longer distances, which requires a larger and heavier battery. Additional research is needed, which is forecast by experts to take a long time.

In conclusion, no serious life-cycle assessment repeats the political fiction that electric vehicles are climate-neutral. The unfortunate truth is that the e-vehicle is not the perfect environmental vehicle as it is commonly portrayed by governments, the manufacturers and the media.

CONSEQUENCES FOR AFFECTED CORPORATE AND GOVERNMENT COMMUNICATORS

What are the tasks for Corporate Communication to deal with this unusual situation in which an image must be corrected, that is not bad but too good? The key for a successful management of such a future communication challenge is careful contingency planning (a part of crisis communication planning). The first step in the contingency planning process is to identify the nature of the challenge. The second step will be to understand which key audiences will be most affected and to adapt the communication tactics to the target audiences’ characteristics and needs. The third major step will be the development of a strategy, which will deal with frustration, disappointment, anger, loss of trust and credibility. This strategy should preferably be non-defensive but based on a constructive(positive) alternative proposal. This contingency plan development process can best be compared to a situation, in which a company and its communication executives learn early about (negative) rumours about the company or its products before “they hit the fan”. Once rumours become widely public, they can damage the company’s reputation, its image and its sales.

RECOMMENDATION

To learn more about this, please read the case study “Rumours” in the Chapter “Crisis Communication” in Rudolf Beger’s new guidebook on “Present-Day Corporate Communication” (www.public-relations-pro.com).

Posted on

THE CHINESE POLITICAL COMMUNICATION CHALLENGE by Rudolf Beger (2018)

(If you want to learn more about Political Communication, read Rudolf Beger’s recently published book “PRESENT-DAY CORPORATE COMMUNICATION”, 2018, www.springer.com)

You can buy your copy of “Present-Day Corporate Communication” on 

http://springer.com –

Amazon (Kindle

Google Play – 

“DO NOT ENGAGE – IGNORE – LEAVE IN DARKNESS – DETRACT“

*Professor Zhang Wei Wei said, that for a longtime already, Western analysts’ predictions about China are wrong. He concludes that this may be a result from China’s official political discourse, which is not easily understandable to non-Chinese because it requires knowledge ofChina’s political context. According toProfessor Zhang, there is a clear and growing demand for a new narrative as both, Chinese and foreigners, want to make better sense of what China will do in the future.

According to Professor Zhang, China’s communication strategy must be designed to overcome prevailing “bad-mouthing” by foreigners. “Bad-mouthing” is Professor Zhang’s reference to alleged biased reporting aboutChina in most Western media. In Professor Zhang’s opinion, the Western media coverage of today’s China seems to be“ten times more ideological than the Chinese media’s coverage of the West”. In his view, the Western media’s cultural and ideological bias is so strong that it reminds him of the Chinese media’s coverage of the West during Mao’s Cultural Revolution.

In Professor Zhang’s view, China’s new communication policy should engage its Western analysts and critics in debates on foreign policy issues, for instance on the South China Sea issue, Taiwan, and N.Korea, in a similar way as Russia’s Putin is doing it on various other issues, for example as regards cyber attacks or the Ukraine.

Professor Zhang’s proposal for a communication counter-strategy to biased Western media reporting is quite surprising:

Professor Zhang assumes that, also in the future, the Western media will fail to take a fresh look at China’s fast-changing society and, as a result, will probably not be able to overcome their ideological straightjackets. As a consequence, Professor Zhang is suggesting a communication strategy, which will

(1) NOT engage in any special activity,

(2) IGNORE the Western media’s bias and misjudgements, and

(3) LEAVE the Western analysts and observers IN DARKNESS.

In this context, Professor Zhang refers to a British Lord’s audience with Chinese Emperor Qianlong in1793, when the Chinese emperor said: “We’re the best, and you’re nothing.” According to Professor Zhang, history has shown that China’s sharp decline after this demonstration of cultural arrogance may be the fate that may befall the West in the future

In my view, Professor Zhang’s proposed communication strategy based on “NO COMMUNICATION” constitutes a real risk for our liberal Western system, for the following reasons:

  • Growing US-led populism in politics,
  • the disregard or devaluation of democratic structures and players such as the demonisation of the free press (“enemy of the people”),
  • the erosion, perversion, manipulation or even mockery of democratic principles and structures,
  • partisan statesmanship,
  • the promotion of divisions over unity,
  • the replacement of democratic dialogue and civilised confrontation by unbridled partiality and (personal) degradation,

will provoke the risk of people finding the undemocratic but stable and economically successful Chinese system of a one-party rule more attractive than our “corrupted” liberal Western democratic system. “Corrupted” because, especially in theUSA, there is too much money involved in the Western democracies’ democratic process.

Particularly in the USA, the three powers involved in the democratic processes are, in an unhealthy way, out of balance. The power of

  • CAPITAL (business power) has so much influence in the USA over
  • SOCIAL power (the media and civil society) and
  • POLITICAL power,

that the USA model of democracy is currently at the brink of getting discredited and can not and will no longer be considered as a model.

The special influence in the USA of capital over social and political power is particularly damaging because democracy presupposes a basic equality of influence. The increasing financial and economic inequality in the USA has, in parallel, increased the differences in influence over US political candidatures and institutions. Those billionaires and foundations who have large financial resources can better influence personal and institutional change than those who do not.

In addition, the diminishing (moral) quality of political leaders in combination with new means of effective mass communication (social media) have led to new phenomena affecting the credibility of the democratic system. Political leaders who perceive themselves as a tribune of the people and promote authoritarian beliefs but no longer act as mediators or refiners of the “empirically found popular will” are bound to create conflict and divisions.

The role played by social media in the decline of democracy is compounded by the fact that political players can use the massive amounts of data about users to craft specifically targeted messages that match specific fears or opinions.

Particular reference is made to “fake news”, “alternative truths” and blunt lies, which,strategically and tactically used, have a clear impact on people’s opinion. As it becomes clearer that the UK referendum on Brexit was based on many lies and fake promises, it also becomes more evident that a lot of small lies in politics become as dangerous as one big lie, especially when weaponised.     

As a result, at present, there is a widespread public perception that democracies around the world are backsliding.This perception is based on some socio-political and economic mechanisms that are driving this decline:

  • For various reasons, citizens of democracies are becoming less content with their institutions. They are increasingly willing to ditch institutions and norms that have been central to democracy;
  • The decline of democratic institutions is intimately connected to feedback loops. Democracy regularly suffers when the gap between a society’s wealthiest and poorest increases;
  • A population with an extreme diversity of opinions and partisan competition can also destabilise a functioning democracy by intolerance, polarisation and radicalisation;
  • In addition, the erosion of widely held social norms can significantly contribute to the breakdown of a democracy. This process is fuelled partly by social media.Private views can easily be displayed to a large audience, whose expressed or tacit endorsement can legitimise even extreme opinions. This helps to create a false consensus effect even for any fringe opinion. Opinion exchange and competition which is a basic and stabilising feature of the democratic system will break down when the possibility for debate and political engagement is destroyed because messages are disseminated without the opponent being able to rebut any of those arguments used.

In view of the increasing self-dismantling of Western moral and political elites, the Chinese option of “a communication policy without communication” would, if implemented, show its long-term effects. The self-destructive process in the West with its negative consequences of a looming longing for “law and order” in an increasingly polarising political environment and an increasing number of people with no experience in practiced democratic free dialogue and debate but the disparagement of the dissident, will make a stable and successful political system such as the Chinese system seemingly desirable. Because polarised constituents may believe it is better to let democracy wither than have their opponent in power the will be a general trend towards and growing attractiveness of alternative regime types, even autocratic leaders. The stepwise development into more autocratic orders (such as in some of the former Soviet Union’s territories) is a conceivable alternative. This development is likely although no efforts are needed by political challengers like the Chinese to achieve this result. The Chinese system has the probability of replacing the traditional role model of Western style democracy and theChinese leaders would be right when deciding to just let it develop by itself and concentrate on their countries individual performance.

Against this background, the Europeans and the rest of the world will be well advised not to consider the USA anymore asa political model and not to follow US inspired populism. Like in many other fields, Europe must wake up, break away from the US politically and militarily and focus on its own strengths.

European have to recognise that,different to China and Europe’s different nations, the USA is a very young state with few traditions, a traditionally inward looking population and very limited foreign policy experience. Most of the USA’s ventures into the rest of the world were based on violence and not on diplomatic talent. In contrast, China and Europe can look back on an eventful history and highly developed culture that allows them to think and act independently of the USA.

At present, the military power of theUSA may seem overwhelming, but, when analysed carefully, it appears like a dinosaur threatened with extinction. The question must be asked, what use the most powerful atomic bomb arsenals, the most invisible planes, the largest aircraft carriers and the “mother of all bombs” have if the effectiveness of these weapons can be overridden by superior cyber intelligence without endangering even one soldier’s life. The current “Russia” probe in the USA is just a model run for what is going to come in the near future.  

The Roman tactics of legionnaires running into their enemies in solid lines was apparently important until the 1st WorldWar and killed millions of misled young men.

After that, more modern tactics, such as fast advances of motorised units (Hitler) and guerrilla warfare (Vietnam, Cuba)were more successful and nations with traded strategies.

Many strategists still believe in hardware and haven’t realised that this may impress reporters, onlookers of military parades and a general public, but not those who have developed the smart know-how to effectively disrupt all command structures and make these proudly presented weapons totally dysfunctional. Tanks and similar iron-age weaponry may be good for getting directed against the political leaders’ own people or unwanted immigrants if they don’t want to follow orders anymore but the leaders’ macho attitude doesn’t work anymore effectively.     

Today, it is software that replaces heavily armed legionnaires and increasingly sophisticated weaponry.

The reader may ask what this consideration of military aspects has to do with communication. Well, to be short, a lot!

In today’s communication overload, each communicator is fighting to being heard. The response to this challenge of a lot of communication practitioners is to become more noisy, more exciting, more surprising and more of whatever in their communications to attract the attention of their target audiences. This is becoming an increasingly difficult, if not impossible task. And frequently, the substantial resources invested stand in stark contrast to the success and / or sustainability of the communication measures.

This makes the possible tactic of “no-communication” proposed by Professor Zhang interesting as an inspiration.If there are new, so far little or not at all used, promising ways of warfare,then new, so far unused or little used ways of communication should also be considered in the field of communication. 

Communication is a peaceful way of conveying an opinion, a message or a piece of news to an audience (sometimes against many odds) that often reacts instinctively and defensively. The word”to impose” was deliberately avoided here, since, unlike in warfare, communication contains a core that has to do with conviction.

Of course, Professor Zhang’s “no-communication” option is a conceivable alternative if one can act from a standpoint of strength, certainty and temporal serenity (like China).  But this cannot be transferred to other cases. As little as the legionnaire tactic of direct clashing forces, described above, cannot be successful today, so much more promising must be the thought of new digitally motivated, technology-supported means and bases of communication. The principles of cyber attacks are known to be based on the intention of destruction and disruption.

However, one has to ask oneself what one can do if one uses the destructive potential to something new and positive. More thought needs to be given to this aspect and future instructions for effective corporate communication need to focus on it.

With its accumulated intelligence, Europe has great opportunities to stand up to the USA. China copies and steals Western intelligence & technologies, not vice versa. That is, at least for the moment, reassuring to know. But the suggested silence (no visible content) of a possible Chinese communication policy must not give cause for calm but must be worrying if ignored.

Europe is posed to develop a matching European communication strategy in response. Different to Trump’s USA, Europe must accept China’s rise and see it as a win-win opportunity and not as an unintelligent zero-sum game, like Trump. 

If it will become part of the Chinese communication tactics to leave us in the West in darkness about their country, we have to ask ourselves why it is that the Chinese do not consider Europe as an inaccessible cultural, historic and linguistic mess.

Our most gifted talents have to study Chinese culture and languages and bring light into the darkness, which theChinese want to protect.

A counter communication strategy has to become extremely long-term, realistic and culturally sensitive and must not be corrupted by typical US-quarterly-result, short-term thinking.

We European have to strive for a win-win and not for a zero-sum game solution (the latter suggested by Trump). 

*Professor Zhang WeiWei is a teacher of international relations at Fudan University (China), and, amongst others, a visiting professor at the Geneva School of Diplomacy and International Relations.

Posted on

BIG LIE VERSUS SMALL LIES

A CRITICAL REVIEW OF US PRESIDENT TRUMP’S COMMUNICATION TACTICS

© RUDOLF BEGER (2018)

  1. THE “BIG LIE”

Many people are worried about the return of the “Big Lie“. In general, a prototypical lie is characterized by falsehood, which is deliberate and intended to deceive. The “Big Lie”, in particular, is a (political) propaganda technique first referred to by Adolf Hitler in his 1925 landmark book “Mein Kampf” about the use of a lie so “colossal” that no one would believe that someone “could have the impudence to distort the truth so infamously”: “…the Big Lie (has) always a certain force of credibility; because the broad masses … in the primitive simplicity of their minds (are) more (ready to fall) victims to the Big Lie than the small lie, since they themselves often tell small lies in little matters …”.

Hitler suggested the “Big Lie” technique was used by the Jews to blame Germany’s loss in the First World War on German General Ludendorff, a prominent post war nationalist and antisemitic political leader. Joseph Goebbels, Hitler’s PR man, stated, that “… people will believe a big lie sooner than a little one; and if you repeat it frequently enough people will sooner or later believe it.” He insisted that “… all effective propaganda must be limited to a very few points and must harp on these in slogans until the last member of the public has understood.”

Ironically, later in history it was Hitler’s regime that actually employed the “Big Lie” propaganda by mass disseminating this core and a few additional chief falsehoods to the German public. Like a pyramid building, the “Big Lie” organized underneath a configuration of smaller lies. The primary rules of the National Socialists’ “Big Lie” propaganda strategy were:

  • Distort the truth massively and infamously;
  • Never allow the public to cool off;
  • Never admit a fault or wrongdoing;
  • Never concede that there may be some good in the enemy;
  • Never leave room for alternatives;
  • Never accept blame;
  • Concentrate on one enemy at a time, and
  • Blame the enemy for everything that goes wrong.

After Germany’s military defeat in 1945, and although the “Big Lie” was a product of a very short historical period in Germany, in particular intellectuals feared the emergence of another “Big Lie”. Amongst the most prominent was the author George Orwell (famous for his novels “1984” and “Animal Farm”). He warned of “the truth getting turned upside-down” again by just a handful of falsehoods. His obsession was about the next fiction, which would claim that “war is peace”, “freedom is slavery”, “four is five”, and “ignorance is strength”. His fears were not unfounded because the “Big Lie” as a principle continued throughout the following conflict between the capitalist West and the communist East during the whole so-called Cold War.

  • For the West, Russian Communism enslaved the individual;
  • For communist Russians, the West’s capitalists were enslaving workers through the false promise of capitalist “freedom”.

Each side accused the other of using a “Big Lie” as the means of respective alleged exploitation. Hannah Arendt, the German-American philosopher and political theorist, warned: “… in an ever-changing, incomprehensible world the masses (would) reach the point where they would, at the same time, believe everything and nothing, think that everything was possible and that nothing was true.”

The question is whether the “Big Lie” concept will function in our present-day environment, which is largely characterised by (individual) mobility, globalisation, digitalisation, borderless mass information, cross-border networking, limitless exchange of information, international networks and supranational political structures (e.g. European Union).

A look at communist China shows that in this closed society, one-party-rule country, the “Big Lie” concept is not functioning in perfection. The Chinese leadership was intelligent enough not to use a “Big Lie” approach to control any possible discontent. Although the country’s undemocratic leadership would have been most able to control any information, there is still a multitude of voices expressing political and civic dissent. Instead, the Chinese leaders decided to use alternative means such as smart mass distractions including free travelling, overseas tourism and the massive use of the Internet (different to neighbouring communist North Korea).

In contrast, in the USA, critics of US President Trump observe that in his communications, Trump has been “doing to political ends, what Hitler did to more brutal ends: Using “mass deception” as masterful propaganda.” The term “mass deception” does not necessarily assume the existence of a “Big Lie” and it is apparent that Trump did not choose that option. Still, at present, a real fear exists that the US (and some other countries in the world) may be at risk to become victim of a “Big-Lie syndrome”. However, a closer look at the facts suggests that the current threat is different: In reality, we are not faced with a single “Big Lie” but an accumulation of “small lies” (and / or variants of “small lies”).

In fact, independent data show that during 2017, Trump lied 2,140 times about various subjects, all of them individually not qualifying as one single “Big Lie”. The many smaller dishonesties (generously characterised as “stretching things” by US top Republican Newt Gingrich) and the resulting confusion are one of the defining features of Trump’s Presidency when one realizes that, on average, he lied 5.9 times a day.

The regularity, frequency and rapid succession of these deplorable “information disorders”, which include “alternative facts”, “alternative truths”, and the like give reason to believe that Trump’s production of this whole bouquet of falsehoods, half-truths, misquotes, assertions, etc. is part of a systematic offensive. “Systematic” because the President has chosen in principle to act according to this model, but not in a way planned in any detail, as topics, people and occasions seem more or less left to chance.

Trump critics regularly get excited about confusion, chaos and unpredictability as negative features of his Presidency and his communication style. But this is a rather naive or conservative assessment of the President’s actions. It overlooks that from Trump’s point of view, unpredictability, confusion and chaos are intended. They important intermediate steps of his strategic plan to achieve the political goal “Make America Great Again” (MAGA) in a way that his former thought leader Steve Bannon pointed out to in many contributions. Although Trump removed Steve Bannon as his special “strategic advisor”, he has not ceded following Bannon’s ideological program. In the past, Bannon had declared himself a “Leninist,” stating that the Soviet ideological leader “…wanted to destroy the state, and that’s my goal too. I want to bring everything crashing down, and destroy all of today’s establishment…”. Trump’s obvious disrespect and openly manifested contempt for the “administrative state”, members of his close staff, established procedures, regulatory agencies and other bureaucratic institutions, as well as (international) conventions and alliances serve the goal of deconstruction for getting a better “deal” for the USA. As a logical consequence, unpredictability, chaos and the President’s very lax approach to facts and truths are an integral part of his agenda (“we have to be unpredictable … predictable is bad…”). Under no circumstances they are solely due to Trump’s ignorance, incapacity or amateurism. If they were just slips of a naive beginner, his emotional followers would probably have started already to turn away or make fun of him because their instincts would tell them that he is a loser.

The quality of Trump’s untruths and half-truths reflects the quality of his political goals. These are more based on deep-seated political resentments, “regulars’ table rant”, and superficial, vulgar analysis than on serious socio-economic and political analysis. The idea to solve a socio-political, demographic and economic problem such as illegal immigration, for instance, by constructing a wall like in the Middle Ages corresponds closely with Trump’s lie that the construction of the wall is under way (which is not the case).

This illustrates why many skeptics may be worrying about the wrong thing when fearing the emergence of a new “Big Lie” because the sheer amount of “small lies” and their many variants might just be as frightening. “If falsehood, like truth, had only one face, we would be in better shape,” the philosopher Michel de Montaigne famously wrote. “But the reverse of truth has a hundred thousand shapes and a limitless field.”

2. “SMALL LIES” AND THEIR VARIANTS

Before analysing what different forms “small lies” (and their many variants) can take, one should know the tactical role “small lies” are intended to play as part of the strategic plan of those who are using them to push their political agenda. The tactical role assigned to the “small lies” influences directly the shape, character, composition of and the timing for a tailor-made basket of “small lies”, which are best suited to achieve the desired political / communication goals. In the political field, in general, and in the present political reality in the USA, in particular, political “small lies”, variants and substitutes are designed:

  • To distract (e.g. from negative or embarrassing news);
  • To entertain (e.g. as a way to effectively transporting messages);
  • To muddy (e.g. to hide uncomfortable truths), and, finally,
  • To confuse the public, the media, the opponents and even the supporters (e.g. to create an environment of “divide and rule”).

Some people say that “small lies” are never small and claim that “small lies” are “Big Lies.” And indeed, according to expert studies, people are more desentitized to dishonesty the more they are exposed to (small) lies. Expert findings also came to the conclusion that continuous telling of small lies can desensitize people’s brains and encourage to tell or to believe in bigger lies in the future. We know this effect from similar escalations in other areas such as risk taking or violent behaviour. The dangers of small acts of dishonesty become even more evident when full-fledged lies or surrogates such as alternative reality, alternative truths, conspiracy theories and other information disorders are accumulating to a “grand story” of falsehoods. That means that, in effect, there seems to be a similar problem with small lies as with an overarching “Big Lie” when too many (smart) small lies (or variations of lies) are produced.

Applying these insights to the current situation in the USA and examining President Trump’s behavioral pattern, one quickly comes to the conclusion that the sheer volume of small lies and the many other variants of disinformation make so-called “fact-checking” a totally irrelevant activity, in particular when “facts” are generally denunciated as “lies” and fact-checkers as “enemies”.  It seems that at present fact checking has widely lost its political clout and impact, especially in a situation of information overload.

  • Just the enormous amount of information alone makes it almost impossible for the information corrected by fact checking to reach the desired addressees effectively;
  • In addition, fact checking lost some of its importance in a world, which can be described as a post-fact political world. Post factual, because as a result of ultra fast information technology developments, the emergence of highly individualised (social) media channels and the fragmentation of the media.

On the basis of these trends one can speak of a schizophrenic situation:

  • On the one hand, the new technologies allow for and lead to a high degree of specialization and individualization. This development is demonstrated by the recent emergence of highly specialised and micro-target group oriented radio and cable TV outlets, news sites, blogs, podcast, new social media channels;
  • On the other hand, the new technologies represent the risk of a development towards a presumptuous “synchronization” of information and its interpretations. This exposure is strengthened by a tendency in social behaviour according to which people increasingly tend to cluster with like-minded people. This and the introduction of changed algorithmic newsfeeds has resulted in a situation in which information is at risk to become “synchronized” in a kind of “silo effect” process under which each faction or (micro-) group is only exposed to their own (selected) “facts”, i.e. information that affirms their given point of view by exposing them only to what they want to hear. Today, Tweets are displayed based on a calculation of “relevance” rather than “recency”. The algorithm has taught itself that network users are more likely to stick around if they see content that has already gotten a lot of retweets and mentions, compared with content that has fewer. Human biases play an important role: Since one is more likely to react to content that taps into existing individual beliefs, inflammatory tweets will generate quick engagement. For this reason, Twitter, Facebook and other social media make the flow of misinformation as a combination of human and technical factors. At its worse, this cycle can turn social media into a kind of confirmation bias machine, which is perfectly tailored for the spread of misinformation.

In this information overload environment, the new combination of adversarial populist movements, on the one hand, and social media and its development into a quasi “bias-confirmation-machine”, on the other hand, the authority of facts is sent in decline. Resulting from this, the relevance of “fake news“ has become more important. In this new reality, the short-lived nature of information and public attention and the overwhelming wealth of information mean that even after a fact check has been carried out, a possible correction or proof of a lie is no longer of great interest or has become irrelevant, will be perceived as outdated or simply lost in the sea of information. The lie, if there was one, will disappear into the archives and added to the statistics, for which, as one can assume, there are few interested parties. The additional effect of the new realities is that small (specialised) lies can be effectively directed at different (specialised, micro-) target audiences. This targeted approach can make them even more powerful tools than a single “Big Lie” as their specific content will be designed to perfectly match the specialised recipients’ perspective. Today, consumers are able to shape their media consumption around their own expectations, opinions and prevailing prejudices, and populist leaders are prepared to encourage them, even when it involves excesses of populist, emotional and lying demagogy and abuses of facts. Populist politicians such as Trump use these new insights and tools intelligently or instinctively. The US President’s unusual and unprecedented social media presence and his raw, prolific stream of tweets on Twitter is a result of his decision to provide unfiltered messages to his constituents without the concern that his comments are being taken out of context (ironically a frequent complaint voiced by Trump’s supporters). The ready availability of Trump’s unfiltered tweets has become an alternative to the traditional practice that US presidents give interviews to the media. In comparing the alternatives, the concern is that using Twitter allows the President to lie without being contradicted by journalists in a face-to-face interview environment.

In addition, to his many lies, the US President has shown a proclivity to constantly repeat many of his false or misleading statements either via Twitter or at his many flee flying rally style public appearances. If the “Big Lie” seems to have been replaced in effectiveness by a multitude of small lies and knowing that small lies can take different forms and characters (ranging from a blunt lie to disguised or intelligently wrapped up variants or substitutes), one must identify these variants and substitute lies as such. This is important since, under this assumption, it is not the individual small lie, which counts, but the totality of the “information disorders” (whatever shape they take) that contribute to the degree of political dangerousness.  

According to the Council of Europe’s 2017 “Information Disorder Report”, there are three types of “information disorder”:

  • Mal-information, i.e. information that is based on reality, used to inflict harm on a person, organization or country;
  • Mis-information, i.e. information that is false, but not created with the intention of causing harm, and
  • Dis-information, i.e. information that is false and deliberately created to harm a person, social group, organization or country.


From this follows that it is important,

  • To distinguish messages that are true from those that are false, and
  • To distinguish messages that are created, produced or distributed with the intention to do harm from those that have no bad intentions.

The information disorder problem was formulated already a long time ago and the phenomenon of “fake news” already existed in the past (especially during World War I and II). After the world wars, during the Cold War period, Soviet Russia invented the word “dezinformatsiya” (disinformation) meaning false information that is deliberately intended to mislead.

There is no agreement on what “fake news” really means, how much of a problem it is, and what to do about it. Fake news are characterised bythe repeated use of catchwords, phrases and talking points to which factual rebuttals are ignored. Currently, the term “fake news” is usually used to describe falsehoods or hoaxes, which are proliferated via social media and considered as dangerous in part because they are so easily and quickly shared online. In fact it was the emergence of the Internet and resulting social media communication that has made “fake news” more notable and more effective than before. In our post-truth political environment, “fake news” differ from the traditional contesting and falsifying of facts by relegating facts and expert opinions to be of secondary importance. Still, “fake news“ was not a term many people used a couple of years ago. But after his election in 2016, the US President began to use this term regularly to dismiss any negative press coverage of his Presidency. Whilst the US President sees “fake news“ as a reflection of his personal reality (in his case as a perceived victim), others see it as one of the greatest threats to democracy, free media and debate. Objectively seen, “fake news” is a type of propaganda. One could argue that the term “fake news” actually combines the above-referenced three types of information disorder (i.e. mal-information, mis-information and dis-information) and is always intentional. Usually, the intent is

  • To make it more difficult for journalists to cover significant news stories in a professional and objective way;
  • To mislead and influence public audiences in order to damage a cause and / or to mislead for a defined reason, generate online revenue, and
  • To (deliberately) increase political polarization.

In addition to “fake news“, as part of the three “information disorders”, there are many other shades of “information disorders”, including harmless satires or parodies, more serious misleadings, improper, manipulated or fabricated contents, false connections or contexts. However, a critical review of the arsenal of disinformation in all its shades would be incomplete if one ignored the fact that the quality of the target groups has changed recently. Demographic, social-psychological and technical developments are responsible for this development. The psychology of the target groups and the effectiveness of the information and disinformation tactics chosen to influence them are closely related and therefore cannot be ignored. 

TARGETING

Targeting does not stop with the careful definition and analysis of the target groups. In addition, a successful communicator has to understand his target audience. This requires that the communicator must try to put himself in the psyche of the identified target group and understand the state of mind, the language and the expectations. Only if he knows what the expectations, hopes, concerns and the language of his target group are can he expect his communication to reach these people and be perceived with his messages (the “recipient perspective” principle). Under this principle, the communicator has to imagine himself in turn as a member of the different groups he must reach, and thereafter construct a campaign, which will appeal to as many people as possible. The campaign content shall be news, which are relevant and newsworthy, not necessarily in an objective way, but for the selected target audiences.

In his public communications Trump has, until todate, been very effective because his communications widely match his target group’s expectations. He knows that a lot of people in the USA are unhappy with a lot of different things (e.g. terrorism, illegal immigration, the economy post financial meltdown, security, changing demographics, political correctness, environmental regulations, and lots more). A lot of those in US society that feel powerless and disaffected want to believe that one guy, who has crafted an image as a very successful businesman, will fix everything that they see as wrong. This is an important reason why Trump’s “fake news“ model seems to work so successfully. As long as there will be enough demand for his messages,  as long as these messages are made in a way that they are appealing to his target groups and as long as there are enough people with strong partisan feelings who want to hear “fake messages“, Trump will be successful with his communication tactics. These are the prerequisites for a successful acceptance of this type of (mis-) information.

Being a populist means that the communicator responds successfully to public expectations (“public opinion”). This is also because he has interpreted “newsworthiness” in a non-conventional way: Ignoring the traditional requirements for a message to become newsworthy, his messages are frequently about subjects, which his audience like and wants to hear. This can also be lies or fake news and repetitions when these reconfirm the audience’s pre-set opinions. In addition, the message can deal with people the audience respects or admires or subjects they are familiar with or an area characterized by strong prevailing convictions. The messages must be brought forward using media channels, which capture public attention (in this case, a few interviews and lots of Tweets on Twitter). This and a major portion of aggressiveness is providing Trump with his successful activities in steering public opinion and maintaining his fans’ support.  In his (ghostwritten) book “The Art of the Deal” Trump wrote: “The final key to the way I promote is bravado. I play to people’s fantasies. People may not always think big themselves, but they can still get very excited by those who do. That’s why a little hyperbole never hurts. People want to believe something is the biggest and the greatest and the most spectacular. I call it truthful hyperbole. It’s an innocent form of exaggeration — and a very effective form of promotion.”

In an increasingly “populist” worldpublic opinion is becoming more and more a matter of interest. “Public opinion” can be defined as an random amount of personal judgments on the mind of an average individual, which generally is not well refined but can still be quiet strong, beyond any rational and resistent to any logic. Examples are prejudices, stereotypes, resentments and (largely unfounded) convictions. Communicators (e.g. the media, politicians but also corporations) must understand this complexity and assess what new facts the public (their selected publics) will absorb in consideration of the solid barrier of prejudices, stereotypes, pp. these people hold. An example for this mental barrier phenomenon is that large sections of the electorate and politicians are delusionally trying not to have to face reality, for instance, with respect to:

  • Problems of global warming and climate change (mainly in the USA, China and developing countries);
  • The approaching end of “dirty” fuels, raw materials and production processes and the associated loss of jobs;
  • Dwindling resources and resulting price explosions and conflicts;
  • The impending traffic congestion and resulting pollution in the world’s metropolises;
  • The approaching end of the internal combustion engine without a viable alternative available at present;
  • The dangers of re-ideologisation, the return to religious intolerance and the resulting (violent) cultural conflicts, “racism” and refugee problem;
  • The growing dangers of uncontrolled economically induced South-North immigration (Europe, Africa, USA);
  • The proliferation of weapons of mass destruction (Iran, North Korea) and gun control (USA).

In his book “The Revolt of the Masses“ (1929/1930), Portuguese philosopher Ortega y Gasset is describing the rise to power and action of the masses in society. Ortega is very critical of both the masses and the mass-men of which they are made up. He identifies a new sociological species: The “mass-man”, who, in his view, is a plebeian (in ancient Rome: A commoner). In describing the “mass-man”, Ortega does not make reference to any social class. Instead, he sketches a certain type of European, mainly by analyzing his behaviour in the context of the respective civilization into which he was born irrespective from his social background. In contrast to the nineteenth century values and its aristocratic style of politics, the modern “mass man” is characterized by “a plebian absence of unique values, distinct personality traits and lacking a sense of personal and social responsibility”. Ortega portrays him as a specialist who believes that he “has it all“ and extends the command he seems to have of his subject to others, “contemptuous of his ignorance”.

According to this description, Ortega’s “mass man“ is the kind of human being who is the dominant social force in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries and the model basis for any kind of populism. Populism as represented by Brexit supporters in the UK, Orban in Hungary, Erdogan in Turkey and Trump in the USA rejects the legitimacy of political institutions and the free media. For instance, Trump believes, that he is directly representing the will of the (majority of) people. He has made this very clear by his excessive use of Twitter. This must not be misunderstood as his special personal feature but must be seen as a calculated move enabling him to bypass institutions and be in direct contact with the US people. This is in stark contrast to the traditional doctrine of constitutional law. This law assumes that elected representatives do not implement the will of the people directly. Instead, elected representatives have a social responsibility towards their country to act as “ennoblers of the will of the people”. Their task is to ensure that prevailing prejudices, false convictions, resentments and stereotypes will not be translated into political actions but get refined in the interest of the whole. Populist leaders do not accept this social responsibility. They just refer to the outcome of the vote (as done by the Brexit supporters) and ignore their responsibility, which would require them to enhance the people’s opinion for the good of the country. This is particularly necessary when the vote (like the Brexit vote in the UK) was based on false figures, misinformation, disinformation, fake news, unwarranted fears and not realistic expectations among the people. In this case, prejudices, stereotypes, false beliefs and errors should have fought or refined by these politicians and not be strengthened for political motives.  

In addition to charcterizing the mass man (who is allowing the success of populism), Ortega points out to the “mass man’s” lack of even a rudimentary understanding of culture. He concludes that the “mass man’s” inability to make a distinction between “civilisation” and “culture” represents a specific danger. One of the effects of this inability to distinguish can be the growing vulgarization of our society and, part of this, a vulgarisation of human interaction, values, esteems, style and communications. Although people often conflate the terms culture and civilization, there are major differences:

  • Civilization is a means: It is a process of organising and developing the human society by the means of technical and technological tools, social and political organisation that make life possible in a social group;
  • In contrast, culture is an end: It is the set of knowledge, experiences, values, traditions, morals, (intellectual and artistic) achievements and behaviours, which is commonly shared by a group of people. A culture normally exists within a civilization. In this regard, each civilization can contain weak or strong, and not only one but several cultures. Culture can exist in itself whereas civilization cannot be called a civilization if it does not possess a certain culture.  From this follows that a civilization will become empty if it does not have its culture, no matter how little it may be.

Vulgarity is a senseless violation of the norms and standards established in society. In the recent years, it has been manifested in daily life by people, generally showing contempt for decent language (in real life in the USA, the phenomenon concentrates and is exemplary through the omnipresent word f… In official parlance this word, originating from the language of vulgarized sexuality, is no longer denied as a generally used expression, but hypocritically replaced by the abbreviation f…. The user of this abbreviation knows which word he means and assumes that the addressee also knows it. Both parties know and still pretend to preserve a rest of decency, which makes this tacit “complicity” even more embarrassing as it is revealing their lack of good education and their hypocrisy.

The completely unfounded overestimation of the importance and senseless glorification of trivialities such as sports, film, TV, rock and pop careers (today one is already a “star” if one lets play the same “sound” as smoothly as possible as a so-called “disc jockey”) makes Nobel Prize winners pale although they generally make an undisputed timeless scientific, artistic or political contribution to humanity. Movies today, do not even pretend to be art but have degenerated just to a business with no justification of the rubbish, the horror and the vulgarity they produce, unless they are produced for a small number of people interested in culture who are forced to meet in special niches of the entertainment arena. Here too, Ortega’s mass-man takes his toll. Vulgarization pervading the whole society changes its psychology, which in turn has consequences for the forms of communication with which people can be effectively reached. This has an effect on communication tactics and tools, the language and channels used to reach the targeted audiences. Again, Trump can serve as a good example for the vulgarisation of words, wasy and means and subjects of communication. Trump uses words, which have a clichéd and casual (non-presidential) nature, stock phrases, exxagerations (”biggest in history”), particularly “discourse markers” like “anyway”, “so”, “you know”, “belive me”, and, prominently, the “queen of weak formulations”: “things”. Especially outstanding and worth mentioning here are his personal insults of any kind of opponents, his or his supporters’ use of two-word adjective-plus-name combinations such as  ‘crooked Hillary’ or ‘porn lawyer”.

The particular reference to Trump’s contribution to “culture” leads to a brief consideration of the role of the USA as contributor to human culture and the influence of that contribution on the political target audiences’ psychology. To say that US-Americans have no culture may be dismissed as snobbish. But it seems fair to say that the USA in particular have spread around the world a lot of the cultureless aspects of this and the preceding centuries’ modernity. Observers who complain about “globalization” are really complaining about “Americanization”. They see that today, US culture has become the world’s most widespread and influential culture, so powerful and ever-present that they fear it may actually damage their own national cultures. Much of American culture aims for the lowest common denominator and this more in the popular (“pop”) than in the “high culture” field. It celebrates the commonplace, the average, the universal. This assumption is highlighted by a US-American patriot’s claim that “Elvis is as important as Mozart”.

The reason for US culture’s predominantly  “popular“ character is the result of so-called “universal systems” which were deliberately created in the USA to form a nation. After its foundation the American leaders desperately tried to unite the diversity of different nationals, customs, mentalities, traditions, beliefs and races pouring into the country to experience the so-called “American Dream“. Their challenge was to create a new nation state with an own, new identity.

The universal character of the USA’s cultural contribution, its common touch and common taste became popular around the world because it stuck to the basics and frequently chose the lowest common denominator. This is what led former French President Chirac to support putting a limit on the number of US films that could be shown in French cinemas because he did not want to see “European culture sterilized or obliterated by American culture for economic reasons that have nothing to do with real culture.” On the other hand, other countries opening up to globalization such as China, India and its neighbours in South East Asia and the Middle East, for instance, only seemed to be interested in the civilization of Western technology. The Chinese, in particular under their current regime, are apparently unprepared to accept what Ortega called the cultural underpinnings that creates Western technology (civilization). They and others have shown relatively little interest in Western values such as individual freedom, democratic institutions, the workings Western educational institutions and the free exchange of ideas and information.

In consideration of growing populism, the continuously increasing vulgarisation and global technologoical change, the analysis of political target audiences requires a thorough understanding of “crowd psychology”, also known as “mob” or mass psychology” (Ortega: “The Revolt of the Masses”). An important factor in effective targeting is the insight that today publics are increasingly synchronised by the omnipresent social media and other sources of easily accessible information. The ways in which the psychology of a crowd differs from and interacts with that of the individuals within that crowd relates to the behaviours and thought processes of both, the individual crowd members, and the crowd as an entity. Crowd behaviour is heavily influenced by the loss of responsibility of the individual and the impression of universality of behaviour, both of which increase with crowd size. A talented mass communicator like Trump knows that to influence crowds he has to serve existing stereotypes (“illegal immigrants”), has to combat opaque machinations commonly perceived as undertaken by powerful intransparent groups (“the Washington swamp”), and create new or strengthen existing stereotypes or prejudices as perceived appropriate (e.g. by using “small lies” or “fake news”).

In addition to these demographic, cultural and mass psychological changes of the public, rapid digitalisation and growing online activity of people in the private and the professional sphere are bound to transforming people’s overall behaviour. In general, the Internet has become a dominant force when it comes to social interaction, networking, how information is accessed, gathered and exchanged, (relevant) news and perspectives are shared and discussed, and individuals are mobilized to become interested. The Internet, smartphones, tablets, smartboards and e-readers and the like are currently reshaping people’s reading and learning habits as intensively as Gutenberg’s first printing press did in the 15th century. As a result, the way of obtaining new information (e.g. by visiting libraries versus using a search engine) is changing and llinear reading is increasingly becoming a lost skill. For many students and former book lovers, using physical books have become a thing of the past. Any communication plan has to adapt its tactics to these new habits to reach its target audeineces and to thus to remain effective. 

Another (newer) trend is the growing scepticism, which a large part of the public has developed towards parliamentary democracy. Citizens seem to be increasingly disenchanted by and disengaged from democratic processes and particularly core institutions of representative government. There is a widespread public feeling that government is remote, insensitive and untouchable and that the “political class“ conducts politics in a way that turns off ordinary voters. A good example is the European Parliament and the European executive institutions, which have an important influence on the day-to-day life of European citizens. Although politicians are aware of this scepticism they do not seem to find the right answers to this challenge. On the other hand, everybody knows that people lamenting about the deficiencies of democracies are not only frequently uniformed but show no interest in engaging, take office or responsibility but stay apathetic.

In the USA it can be seen where the sometimes only dull and hardly expressed dissatisfaction of large groups of voters can lead. The dissatisfied US citizens and those who feel overlooked or missed out have generally reacted positively to the crude communication tactics and promises of their current president. And this even in a manner almost reminiscent of “faith” that seems to forgive Trump for any mistake. This constitutes a big, almost insurmountable tactical challenge for his opponents, as their political adversary seems unassailable as long as his supporters trust him blindly. This experience should serve as a warning for those democratic politicians in other countries who feel comfortable by just relying on facts, fact checking and the supposed strength of their political arguments. They can very quickly be outmaneuvered. If a challenger enters the political scene on whom hope is pinned by large parts of a generally dissatisfied population, established politicians and parties could quickly find themselves in the opposition even if they thought they had the better arguments (example: France’s Macron).

The challenger’s use of populist arguments will help him, even if they include falsehoods (as demonstrated by the successful Brexit campaign in the UK). Regardless of the credibility and truth of the challenger’s arguments, there is hardly an effective resistance if the challenger uses:

  • The whole bundle of small lies, half-truths, untruths, mis- and disinformations and other attractive means (para. 1, above);
  • Mass psychology;
  • The psychology of his target groups, and
  • Communication tactics adjusted to above (para 3).

4. WEAPONISING “SMALL LIES”

Although the strategies of the “Big Lie” and many “little lies” may diverge, they threaten similarly in scope. In their means they may differ, but in their ends they are not so different. Many demagogues, political leaders and other public figures have understood that “small lies”, its variants and additional alternative information disorders can be added up to a “Grand Story”, which will have similar effect as a single “Big Lie”. A condition for making “small lies” as effective as a “Big Lie” is when the “small lies” and their variants are “weaponised” as part of a comprehensive  “information warfare” concept.

During the last decades, the term “weaponize“ has proliferated outside its initial military context. The original meaning was “to adapt or convert something into a powerful means of gaining advantage“. This is illustrated by the following example: The word “racist” was created specifically to target white people’s suprematist attitude. But today, it has become a “weaponized“ word. The reason for its use is generally to stigmatise certain judgmental or derogatory remarks. In the current political environment of “political correctness“, this stigmatisation can become a weapon in the hands of the person using this word against someone else. This person’s defaming use can, in many different situations, may have a devastating effect on the person designated as such, especially when used quite unreflected and sweeping as it is frequently the case.

The “weaponization” of small lies and its closest variant, i.e. misinformation, have abandoned the traditional goals of public diplomacy, persuasion, propaganda and the conventional standards of truth and credibility. They are replaced by more subtle shifts of meaning: Hyperbole, credible deniability, obfuscation, and, more recent, “whataboutism”. The 2016 US presidential election can be seen as an unprecedented climax in the “weaponization” of words, themes, attitudes and people.

  • Amongst many others, Trump has particularly “weaponized“ the issues of immigration and trade;
  • Putin has weaponized Wikileaks against the Clinton campaign, and
  • Trump opponents have weaponized “diagnoses of alleged mental illness“ and television testimonies of women with questionable reputations against Trump.

Under Putin, ideology is no longer the “wardrobe of politics“ (as it was under the Communist regime) but rather an interchangeable and contradictory set of accessories. Where the Soviets once co-opted and repurposed concepts such as “democracy,” “human rights” and “sovereignty” to mask their opponents (dialectics), Putin uses them to suggest that not even the West really believes in them (“whataboutism“). His more fluid approach to ideology allows him to simultaneously back far-left and far-right movements, obscure conspiracy theorists, greens, anti-globalists and financial elites as the only aim has become to exacerbate divide and strengthen support for Russia’s national (no longer ideological) goals. In support of these goals, Russia has made much use of information warfare including the “weaponzation“ of (dis-)information.

Russia exploits the idea of freedom of information to inject disinformation into society. The effect is not to persuade, as done in classic public diplomacy, or to earn credibility but to sow confusion via conspiracy theories and falsehoods. There is an increasing use of social media to spread disinformation and trolls to attack publications and personalities. This approach based on “weaponisation“ does not need a “Big Lie“ but lives from a wealth of small lies and countless variations. Examples for how the Russian are mastefully operating their system of “weaponsation“ of small lies and others include: 

  • The Russians embrace Instagram but deem the Internet a CIA invention;
  • Russia censors online information but provides a platform to the founder of WikiLeaks who is proclaiming total “transparency”;
  • Russia condemns corporate greed by celebrating Occupy Wall Street while presiding over an economy as corrupt as Nigeria’s.

The rebranding and repositioning of the international branches of its state-owned news groups reflect Russia’s intent to influence and manipulate opinion abroad. Today, Russian state-owned or state-controlled media distribute outright lies and distribute specially targeted disinformation. The fabricated reports of the crucifixion of a child by Ukrainian forces and the fals reports of the kidnapping of a Russian-German national in Berlin are just two examples.

In the past, Hitler’s Minister for Propaganda, Joseph Goebbels, relied on the compliant broadcast system under which a small number of people under his central direction were able to influence and shape the perceptions and beliefs of an entire nation (“the few-to-many architecture). In contrast, the Internet provides a structure under which every desktop is a printing press, a broadcasting station, and place of assembly (“many-to-many” architecture). New information technologies make it possible to recreate the perfect information plaza, a meeting place where citizens could go to be fully informed and to participate directly with no intermediary involved.

This is Trump’s explanation of why he has become hyperactive on Twitter: He is using simple language and is seeking the direct dialogue with his citizens without the media as an intermediary. This system allows him, undisturbed by well-meaning counsellors, to to spread his information, which have been proven to include many lies and variants of lies. In addition, Trump is using Twitter as a communication platform in which his talking points travel in both directions:

  • Pro-Trump media such as Fox News reflect Trump’s claims right back to him giving him a millions-of-viewers platform (no matter how outlandish his statements are);
  • Trump, in turn, promotes his media allies in his Twitter communications, for instance by openly promoting their shows and publications.

Trump’s notorious Twitter feeds and his favourite TV and radio talk shows have almost become mirror images of one another featuring totally identical claims (“Attorney General Jeff Sessions is weak”) and catch-phrases (“witch hunt”). The result of this “echo chamber” system is an “alternative reality” where Trump is portrayed as the innocent victim of a plot to undermine his presidency and to take him down.

Although fact-checkers are successful in disclosing his version of reality as a lie, their corrective work has not made a difference for Trump, his media allies and supporters. On the contrary, Trump has repeatedly said that he does not trust the fact-checks and recently he has even accused fact-checkers across the board as “bad people”.  The risk is that attitude at the top starts to serve as a model and encourages for other communicators to do the same.

  • This risk is real as exemplified by the following example: A Florida (USA) Parliament candidate was forced to suspend her election campaign. She had come under fire after claiming that she had received a diploma from her university although the university said she did not received a degree there. When public pressure on her intensified, her spokesperson said that she was not prepared to react to “fake news”. Soon after, she made an apologetic public statement saying that she made “a mistake”. This example shows that someone who knows that he lied still believes that he can save his skin by using the term “fake news“ as a weapon (in form of a denunciation) against those who rightly accuse him of not telling the truth. 

Some critics argue that rather than invigorating it, the Internet could seriously undermine the well functioning of democracy. By providing access to basically everything, it could result in increasing group polarisation, accelerating political arguments to become more simplistic, shrill, distorted, insulting or make it easier for “fake news” or even lies to be noticed in the information overload in such a way that they remain in the memory as “truth”.

 
In one of his Twitter tirades Trump falsely claimed that the “millions of people who voted illegally” prevented him from winning the popular vote in the US elections. “In addition to winning the Electoral College in a landslide, I won the popular vote if you deduct the millions of people who voted illegally”.

Until today, there is no evidence to back up this claim. It was a lie based on the reporting of a conservative website that frequently traffics right-wing conspiracy theories like the idea that “millions of undocumented immigrants somehow managed to get themselves registered and stole the popular vote from Donald Trump”. Trump is using Twitter for all purposes, including insults. His favorite insult is “loser“ (used 246 times as of June 2018). Recently, in the case of an opposing FBI official, he even got carried away insulting him as a “sick loser“. Inceasingly Trump is using de-humanizing terms such as “animals“ (for illegal immigrants), or, more specifically, “dogs“ for people, irrespective of their gender, who have aroused his displeasure. 

Other critics even go so far to say that the Internet is a platform for facilitating political turmoil, civil unrest, increasing political wrath and violent demonstrations amongst previously passive people. The Iran Green Movement, for instance, which succeeded in gathering up to three million peaceful demonstrators had no hierarchical structure but used the Internet to organise itself. In response, to the upheaval, the regime shut down websites and made the Islamic Revolutionary Guards majority owner of Iran’s telecommunications company to prevent the Green Movement’s use of the Internet.

A first step towards “weaponising” information in this new environment of “many-to-many” communication is creating a sense in the public that no source of information can be trusted and that everything said in public is a function of a particular interest. The goal is not to persuade people (that a certain point of view is correct). Instead, the goal is to undermine the adversary’s position by confusing people. This is usually achieved by persuading people that there is no “objective truth”, that no media can be relied upon, that most, if not all news is simply “fake news”, biased, partisan or unfounded propaganda (another version of reality). A successful tactic is to produce different versions of the “truth”, claiming that there is always “another side” to every story.

President Trump’s personal lawyer, Giuliani, delivered the last example for this form of “weaponisation information” when he claimed that there is no “truth”. This Orwell-inspired remark confirms earlier statements, which look like an attempt to undermine empiricism. Giuliani is on record saying that “trust is relative”, that “truth cannot be separated from opinion” and that “facts are in the eye of the beholder” (an alternative interpretation would be that one of the two parties is lying). Another Trump lawyer has assured the public, that “over time, facts develop”, while Trumps senior advisor Conway is on record defending “alternative facts”. Trump himself continues to tell his supporters that he should be considered as the sole authority for truth: “Just remember: What you’re seeing and what you’re reading is not what’s happening … polls are fake, just like everything else”. From this it emerges that the President obviously wants the public to be kept off-balance, confused and unsure of what’s “true” and what’s not, confident that in a battle against reality, Trump’s White House will prevail.

These intentions are also evident in the hostile treatment Trump is giving the mainstream press. Like Putin in Russia, or Erdogan in Turkey, Trump has understood the power of the media and developed his own concept of dealing with that threat. His “enemy-of-the-people” campaign concept against the press is not to win that conflict. Instead, he wants to stabilise his supporter base (by portraying himself as a victim) and create a state of “destabilised perception” to better manage the situation. He knows that information “weapons” can act like an invisible radiation upon its targets so that people do not even feel that they are being acted upon. Therefore, his most important objective has been to erode the public’s belief in the integrity of independent political journalism, particularly investigative journalism and replace it by uncritical reporting (e.g. Fox News). 

Additional instruments helping to “weaponise” small lies and their many variants are (1) “repetition”, (2) the use of simple (vulgar) language, (3) (hardly concealed) aggression, (4) tactical “partnerships”, (5) the tactical “occupation of semantic fields”, (6) “emotions”, and (7) role playing (e.g. the victim’s, patriot’s, saviour’s or hero’s role versus the villain role).

ad (1) Repetition was the essence of National Socialist propaganda. Goebbels was a proponent of the “repeated exposure effect.” He conceded with admiration that the skill of British propagandists during World War I resided in the fact that they used just a few powerful slogans and kept repeating them. The underlying principle is quite unsophisticated: Repeating a message enough times that those listening will remember and believe it (at least its substance) whether it is true or not. Trump has been using the terms “crooked Hillary”, „no collusion“ and “witch hunt“ quite a lot (rightly) assuming that after sufficient repetition of those words, a lot of people will believe him. His associated “chutzpah“ becomes clear when one realizes that Trump has been sued for fraud for Trump University and has been involved in at least 169 federal lawsuits. According to Bloomberg, Trump has either sued or been sued 1,300 times since 2000.

ad (2) Trump may portray himself as a “very stable genius” and “really smart” but his spoken statements say otherwise. An analysis of Trump’s statements and speeches found that he speaks at a level which is lower and that his vocabulary and grammatical structure is significantly more simple than commonly expected from a President of the USA. But his professional past in the rather crude real estate industry and after years of practice as a reality TV star he must have figured out how to use words that everyone listening will understand.

ad (3) Trump finds out the weaknesses of his opponents and aggressively exploits them. In case his opponets are strong, he uses a tactics of taking their strengths and turns them into weaknesses. This is easy for him because he feels that he can say whatever he wants about them without much scrupel and concern for the truth. Trump feels confirmed in his tactics because his fans seem to like it a part of his promised general attack on established structures and people who represent them.

ad (4) The German Third Reich represented the evolution of a tactical “partnership between masses and demagogue“. What the German National Socialists were really meaning was that their (alternative) truth lay deeper than their lies. Their lies were merely instruments (or weapons) as part of a permissible methodology since, in their view, the end justified the means. Therefore, equating their propaganda with lies does not reflect what was really meant: “Propaganda is a form of truth reshaped through the lens of regime intentions”.

ad (5) Trump is successful in occupying semantic fields, for example by continuously focussing on the terms “fake” in relation to “news” and “information”. In linguistics, a semantic field is a set of words, frequently defined by subject matter and related by meaning. A good example is the semantic field of “war” and “battle”. Sport reporters often use it, because some popular sports activities are associated with conflict and violence. As regards his quasi-proprietary use of “fake news”, Trump knows that what was said by the “fake media“ is neither untrue, nor that it was meant to deceive but he does not care. Otherwise he would use alternative language, which explicitly avoids assuming intent, for example, “falsely said,” “claimed without evidence,” or “wrongly asserted”. Trump does not care because it is not his objective to be factually and politically correct but tries to create his “alternative facts”. This become obvious in his occupation of other semantic fields such as “witch hunt”, (no) “collusion”, “voter fraud”, “wire-tapping”, “crooked” and, with reference to Nixon’s Watergate, “spygate” and “pizzagate”. Even the semantic term “immigration”, which, for historical reasons has a positive connotation in the USA, has been negatively occupied by Trump. In public debate today, it is widely understood as “illegal” immigration.

ad (6) Another core part of the German National Socialist “Grand Lie“ theory was the rejection of reason and the prioritisation of emotion. The nature of National Socialist propaganda was to feeling and the mobilization of emotions rather than thinking. For them, the role of the propagandist was to express in words what his audience felt in their hearts.  

ad (7) Trump’s loyal supporter base is instinctively convinced that he is putting America first, fulfilling his many crude promises, is fixing the economy, and heroically fighting mysterious dark forces (“deep state”), which are trying to stop him. In a variation of this “heroe versus villain” saga, Trump’s story is about wall building (immigration), divisions (“the good” and “the bad”, winners and losers), the destruction of the notoriously “corrupt” Washington establishment (“brotherhood” networks), swamp-draining (fighting corruption), and defeating the media, the latter conveniently stigmatized as “enemy-of-the-people”.

According to the USA Constitution, an “enemy of the United States“ means any country, government, group, or person that has been “engaged in hostilities, whether or not lawfully authorized, with the United States”. Even tolerating the greatest extensibility of the term, the Trump-critical press cannot be described as a group that wants to harm the US people in one way or another. This obvious defamatory lie was only created by Trump to portray himself, the New York billionaire businessman, and now political leader, as an American “hero” battling against those who have lost touch with big parts of the US people. His statement is serious as it attacks the principle of US style “checks and balances”, but it does not represent an overarching idea or “Big Lie”.

Tob e accepted and applauded by his supporters For this reason, propaganda had to be primitive and appealing to the audience’s primitive desire for simplification, even at the cost of alienating the intellectuals. As few others, Hitler had understood, the need for the serial creation of enemies. He was a “political entrepreneur“ possessed of the insight that all individual enemies could eventually merge into the one super-enemy (in his view, the Jews). The desired intuitive understanding was that “self-definition“ was best achieved through “other-rejection“. This means that solidarity, loyalty, support, identity, and community are gained at the expense of others. Appeals to style, decency, dignity, good behaviour and traditions will ultimately fail. Applied to the current Trump period (and developments in some other countries such as Poland, Hungary, and Turkey), one sees a parallel: The clear message about “enemies“ (the press is “the enemy of the people” or “drying out the Washington swamp“) and the total disinterest in what is commonly referred to as “presidential style”.

Entertainment and distracting events to place false messages and “alternative facts”: In our highly connected and televised environment, “entertainment and distraction” plays an enormous role in a highly developed society and is frequently used as a platform for conveying alternative realities. Trump masterfully uses his knowledge and experience in this field.

Trump supporters flock to his rallies, are motivated to applaude and defend “their” President prepared to ignore both facts and subsequent false fact corrections. Trump fans, trolls, Trump loyalist politicians, donating business people and eloquent White House staffers play along in a well-orchestrated movement that seems to represent something powerful although it is not representative of the US public at large. Much of what is said in these cercles and in public becomes an alternative reality, which bears almost no resemblance to real news. A good example is the promised construction of a Wall on the US southern border. Trump claims that construction is progressing although he knows that this not true because of the absence of a budget. Other falsehoods are that the opposing Democrats love drug dealers, Obama was born in Africa and wire-tapped Trump Tower and that all journalists who are critical of Trump are “enemies of the people“.

Despite reality television’s junk-food reputation, the Reality-TV genre has grown into a political force in America by taking over US politics, shaping US culture and the US people’s perception of truth. Of course, reality TV is not necessarily real but there is evidence that for some viewers, it can warp their sense of reality and fuel skepticism in the prevailing culture. Trump has used this medium to his advantage. First, the viewing of reality TV has made people used to call into question everything, which fully complies with his above referenced “confusion and chaos” tactics. Second, it seems that Trump runs his Presidency like a TV-reality show: He ignores any protocol and style by attacking his opponents with insults, hires White House senior advisors based on ther TV-reality show acquaintance, puts others into simple made-for-TV archetypes and builds stories in which he is the only hero or saviour.

The tacit toleration of the followers of conspiracy theories at Trump rallies and his decision not to distance himself clearly and explicitly from them: Trump attracts conspiracy theories. At one of his last rallies, there was a visible presence of “Q”, an alias under which racist, anti-semitic, and white suprematist conspiracy theories circulate in online forums. With Trump as President, “Q” now perceives itself as “mainstream” stated online: “Hopefully Trump Q!”, stipulating that Trump is secretly saving the world by doing something amazing and heroic. It is not yet clear how many people are supporting the crude “Q” theories but they are not harmless as demonstrated by “Pizzagate”.

Trump uses the tactics of “storytelling” as a means to portray himself as a hero, the saviour, the dragon-slayer: He knows that stories to be interesting need heroes and villains and there are doubts that Trump has the talent of a storyteller. The villains include Democrats, foreigners, immigrants, unfair trade / contractual partners and the “fake” media.  So in the end, it is “Us” versus “Them”, America versus unfair allies, good versus bad. His stories are often more fiction than fact, but like a novel, they are not really meant to be fact-checked. The narrative is meant to provide drama, which is demonstrated by Trump’s un-presidential expressions of rage, resentment, jokes and insults. In addition, he is able to add an air of mystery about what he is saying. He said for example that quote “We’re doing a lot of things that people don’t even know about” endquote. Of course, this statement cannot be fact-checked and thus it is just part of the story.

Trump is also a master of the technique of “whataboutism”: “Whataboutism” is a reversal of accusation in form of defamation. The tactic behind “whataboutism” is a form of  “you too”. In a situation, Trump is getting accused of something, he will not respond to the accusation or refute the truth of the accusation but charge the accuser with whatever it is he has just been accused of. The Russsians have frequently used that tactic but Trump gave “whataboutism” a renaissance by frequently using it as a way of deflecting criticism for his actions (“why am I accused when what Clinton and Obama did was so bad?”).

Another example for “whataboutism” was displayed at the occasion of the recent diplomatic conflict between Canada and Saudi Arabia on alleged human rights violations in the Kingdom. After Canada tweeted their accusations in Arabic language, the Saudi Government was fighting back. But they were not by dismissing Canada’s allegations or arguing against them. Instead, they ignored the allegations and took a counter attack approach by launching a media campaign criticizing Canada’s human rights record by referring to the struggle of indigenous people in Canada claiming that this minority in Canada had been historically subject to discrimination. At the same time, other Saudi reports listed “the worst Canadian prisons” and described harsh prison conditions.

Trump regularly uses the “scapegoat” approach which means that he is trying to escape responsibility, even for his own direct actions by blaming others. His tendency to blame in particular the political establishment and former administrations for everything is legendary. An additional example for Trump’s “scapegoat” tactics is Trump’s stance on immigrants. As part of his aggressive anti-immigrant campaign rhetoric (“animals”, “take a young, beautiful girl” and “slice… and dice them”), Trump does not just condemn the negative effects of illegal immigration. His words are part of a larger concept under which he tries to scapegoat immigrants as outsiders who are responsible for deep societal problems, crime and violence. Scapegoating immigrants as criminals-in-waiting is not only objectively and politically wrong and immoral, but also politically counter-productive in that it is likely to endanger, not enhance, public safety. In addition, scapegoating foreigners can have a devastating impact on domestic social peace and justify inhumane policies and law enforcement practices.

Trump and his surrogates are also masters in the area of so-called “false-flag” tactics: Anthony Scaramucci, friend of Trump and former White House Communication Director, for example, was forced to walk back a “false flag” tweet that insinuated Democrats opponents might have been responsible for threats phoned into dozens of Jewish community centers around the country.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, and to stay within the military jargon, it can be said that whether a communicator is using one single “Big Lie”, or, alternatively, a concentrated (and “weaponized“) orchestration of many “small lies“ (and/or their numerous variants), will result in the same. The alterantives can be compared to the alternative use of a gun versus a scatter gun. In both cases the desired effect will probably be achieved. But in our current individualized and fragmented environmemt, in the end, the use of a tactical scatter gun concept may probably be even more effective.